Hungary votes to end legal recognition of trans people

From The Guardian UK:

Activists say new law will increase discrimination, especially as Hungarians must often display their ID cards

in Budapest
Tue 19 May 2020

Hungary’s parliament has voted to end legal recognition for trans people, passing a bill that rights activists say pushes the country “back towards the dark ages”.

The new law defines gender as based on chromosomes at birth, meaning previous provisions whereby trans people could alter their gender and name on official documents will no longer be available.

The votes of rightwing prime minister Viktor Orbán’s Fidesz party pushed the legislation through by 134 to 56, with four abstentions. It is likely to be signed into law by the president, János Áder, a close ally of Orbán.

Although Orbán passed a bill during the coronavirus pandemic to allow him to rule indefinitely by decree, the transgender bill was part of a larger package of legislation that went through parliament in the normal way. It was proposed by the deputy prime minister on 31 March, International Transgender Day of Visibility, and amendments submitted by opposition parties were discarded one by one on Tuesday.

The law has been roundly condemned both at home and abroad. Bernadett Szél, an opposition MP who spoke out strongly against the bill in parliament, described it as evil.

Trans people and advocates say the bill will lead to increased discrimination against the community, especially as Hungarian daily life requires people to show their identity cards frequently. It also means that trans people will not be able to choose a name that fits with their identified gender, as Hungarian law requires first names to be chosen from a list kept by the country’s Academy of Sciences, which is sorted according to gender.

“It basically means coming out as trans to complete strangers, all the time,” Ivett Ördög, a 39-year-old trans woman living in Budapest, told the Guardian last month.

The Háttér Society, a Hungarian trans rights group, said on Tuesday that the law violated international human rights norms and went against the case law of the European court of human rights, as well as previous rulings of the Hungarian constitutional court.

Since 2017, legal gender changes in the country have effectively been frozen, and now the backlog of people waiting for the legal procedure will all be rejected, along with any new applicants. Because the new category will list “sex at birth”, there are also fears it could be used to target trans people who have already legally changed their gender.

Krisztina Tamás-Sáróy of Amnesty International said: “This decision pushes Hungary back towards the dark ages and tramples the rights of transgender and intersex people. It will not only expose them to further discrimination but will also deepen an already intolerant and hostile environment faced by the LGBTI community.”

Orbán’s government has increasingly used anti-LGBT rhetoric as part of a perceived culture war, and has made “traditional family values” a mainstay of many of its policies. The speaker of parliament, an Orbán ally, last year compared gay couples that adopt to paedophiles.

2 Responses to “Hungary votes to end legal recognition of trans people”

  1. Charlie Says:

    In the era before modern day record keeping, where everyone needed a copy of tour personal information, it was probably far easier in a legal sense to get a sex change and new alias and move on. My dad taught me about how people until the Depression—when Social Security mandated we all unique ID numbers—if you went afoul in one area, or let’s say you got out of jail and wanted to start new, you could move to another area, assume a new alias, and start over with that name. I wouldn’t doubt before modern medicine, trans people would move with their partner to a new area far from where they originated, and more easily live as their men and women elsewhere. With the ease of surveillance in today’s world, there’s no goddamn way to even do that.

    I’m sure with our Constitution if Trump today managed to pass that mandate on a national level, those of us already legally recognized, we couldn’t be forced to regress due to the prohibition of ex post facto laws (Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3 of the Constitution, since he holds it so dearly). I’m sure taxpayers wouldn’t want their tax money wasted on such an expensive task that affects only a small number of Americans. And states would challenge it under Amendment 10, saying it violates their sovereignty as they otherwise set their own rules for birth and other personnel records, they alone have the right to determine the process of changing birth and other legal records with regards to what sex marker we list ourselves with.

    • Suzan Says:

      When you assume “People couldn’t force other people to______. Or they wouldn’t do_____> It is important to remember Hitler, Warsaw, Lodz etc ghettos plus Auschwitz, Treblinka, Sobibor etc.

      People can and do commit horrible atrocities upon their fellow human which is why we have Holocaust Museums in many major cities.

      “Never Again!” is more than a slogan. Antifascists need to be ready to fight to make certain we never have another Holocaust.

Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: