The Normalization of TS/TG Along with the Normalization of Gay and Lesbian

Transsexual and Transgender people are everywhere, for good or bad, in high positions in life and low

We are not just sex workers and murder victims even though we are often stereotyped as such.

Like other minority groups we are remarkably diverse.  So much so that describing ourselves as either transsexual or transgender says virtually nothing about us as an individuals.

I never saw us as a single community.  TS/TG as identity seemed to form very weak bonds between us.

Often times friendships required additional shared interests.

Identity politics tells us we should make the TS/TG cause the main focus of our lives.

I found that really problematic right from the start because over the years I  started seeing not only the LGBT community as my community, but generally the left wing progressive world as my community

The idea that I should consider myself primarily a member of the “Transgender Community” seemed stifling.

Huffington Post had an article the other day: Jacob Rudolph, Teen Who Came Out In Awards Speech, On Why He Identifies As LGBT   (Rather than Gay)

When the push for transgender as umbrella effort started in the 1990s, I was a volunteer at the LA Gay and Lesbian Community Services Center.  I even celebrated the 25 anniversary of my surgery at Pride Day in 1997.

If people tried to pin me down as to identity I would have said lesbian or maybe bisexual.  I was out about being transsexual, but I never treated transsexual as though it was the only thing about me or even the most important.

As I’ve said in the past I never wanted either transsexual or transgender as a honorific preceding my name.  Now I know there has been a good deal of debate over the proper use of transgender or transsexual as adjective rather than noun, but I find the practice of using it as a title to be far more offensive.  I’m also troubled with it being used as an adjective modifying a profession.  I am a writer/photographer etc who happens to be transsexual.

Last week there was an article on Raw Story:  Colin Powell asks O’Reilly: Why do you only see me as an African-American?

It is the same thing: Why should any of us be seen as only TS or TG?

Seriously what do the terms transsexual or transgender really say about us?  I mean beyond the obvious.

I always felt more a part of the queer alphabet soup than any one particular identity. I suspect many people do.

Because I feel a part of a bigger community I tended to sort things like the passage of laws along lines based on the dialectic of whether they are good for the LGBT etc community or bad for the LGBT etc community.

Now we (TS/TG) people are becoming common place.  For both positive and negative attention.  While we still have the radfem assholes beating on us we also have a lot of feminists including us in things like the Violence Against Women Act.

In the 1970s it Gay and Lesbian people wore buttons and carried signs that read: “We are Everywhere!”

Now TS/TG people are everywhere and while the struggle is far from over we are at least starting to be part of the discourse.  Even when that means speech editors  wind up tacking us on to inclusive speeches, “And transsexual/transgender people too.”

Even though we watch some people strain to be properly inclusive more and more people in not only the LGBT communities but in the progressive communities are starting to make the effort.

After years of being shut out of the elections and watching a right wing minority pull together a coalition of racists, homophobes, and religious fanatics; we’ve started to work together.  Obama may not be our ideal but we overcame the differences of the identity politics that kept minority groups apart for all these years.

We showed up at Occupy.  We show up at anti-globalization rallies, anti-tar sands and pipeline rallies.

More importantly people are beginning to see how diverse a minority group TS/TG people actually are.

While we haven’t gotten the big Federal Inclusive ENDA we have had far greater success in getting major corporations to write TS/TG non-discrimination measures into corporate policy.

So we are getting to a place where we receive the same crappy treatment as the rest of the work force.  We are part-timers with no benefits, no sick time or vacation time.  We are over-worked and over-stressed just like the rest of the work force.

I realize there are way too many throw away and runaway as well as adult homeless TS/TG folks.  We really treat the homeless and disenfranchised in a manner that is unconscionable.  There was an article in the December 10, 2012 New Yorker titled “Netherland” about a young lesbian who ran away to NYC and wound up homeless, as so many LGBT kids do.  She was one of the better equipped homeless LGBT kids and became part of a crew that helped each other survive.  That crew included a trans guy.  They all did sex work and a number of them wound up HIV Pos as a result.  But they were the strong ones and managed to work their way through the social services net work.

What struck me about the article was how the trans-guy was just casually accepted as part of the LGBT mix.  And why not?  They were united by shared problems associated with being young, poor, homeless, and part of the alphabet soup.

But homelessness isn’t just a problem for TS/TG folks or even LGBT folks.  It has become systemic and hits many working class people.  The Nation recently ran an article:  Old, Female and Homeless.

Our employment issues are intertwined with the same issues of employee abuse that all working people face.  Part time, no benefits low paying work in a fire-at-will environment.  Older workers and workers  whose professions have become obsolete due to either automation or off-shoring are particularly hard hit.  See the recent New York Times article:  In Hard Economy for All Ages, Older Isn’t Better … It’s Brutal.

I’ve heard a lot of people use the term “intersectionality of oppressions”.  Indeed most of us live lives that are filled with an intersectionality of oppressions.  Identity politics asks us to make one aspect of our lives the primary source of oppression and focus.

When we do that we miss out on the opportunity to form coalitions across the array of intersectional issues.

Educating people to treat TS/TG people with respect and decency requires effort.  We have already made that effort with other members of the Gay and Lesbian Communities, now we need to reach beyond LGBT.

As TS/TG people we share the same issues as non TS/TG people.

Women in society be they cis or trans, often share the same issues.  Gay or lesbian transfolks share the same issues as non-trans gay and lesbian folks.

Our elderly are often without families and dependent upon Social Security as well as other public services.  Our immigrant sisters and brothers face the same issues other immigrant people face, no matter their document status.

The environment impacts all our lives.  Access to health care, the right to marry.  the right to housing and travel without fear of having your papers challenged are basic rights.

We’ve won two Presidential elections and while it is true Obama isn’t as progressive as we might wish, he is a damn sight better than the alternatives we were presented with.

We need to branch out beyond being TS or TG or even LGBT and form coalitions on the community state and national levels to work together to insure the rights of all.

From Huffington Post:  Why LGBT Equality Means Equality for All


The LGBT movement is not just about what most people would commonly label “LGBT issues,” such as same-sex marriage. LGBT Americans reflect the full diversity of this country, in every way. Our sexual orientations and gender identities cut across every race, ethnicity, age, religion, class and national origin. And the issues that influence our lives are at the intersections of all those distinctions, just as they are about what connects us all: poverty, racism, sexism and systemic economic and legal inequality.

When it comes to immigration, our movement is again deeply intertwined with the struggle for equality for all immigrants — which the president emphasized as another crucial component to our national journey in both speeches. There are an estimated 11 million undocumented immigrants in this country, 11 million who have no clear path to citizenship, who must hide the truth about how they came to this country, who must live their lives in constant fear of being forcibly separated from their families and from the people they love most, and who are at continual risk of being detained and subjected to appalling abuses. Many of these individuals and families are LGBT, and our movements have united out of the common cause that no one should be forced to hide any aspect of their identity. LGBT people have joined in calling on the president and Congress to pass comprehensive immigration reform and in taking a stand against blatantly discriminatory laws such as Arizona’s S.B. 1070, and Latino and immigrant rights organizations have joined in taking strong stands in support of LGBT equality.

And one of the pillars of the LGBT rights movement is this truth: The government does not have the right to control our bodies by legislating on the basis of a narrow standard for sexuality. But that same controlling impulse is behind the right wing’s efforts across the country to restrict abortion and access to contraception, and to mandate abstinence-only education. Their intent is clear: to deny women control of their own sexuality. On the 40th anniversary of Roe v. Wade, LGBT Americans are among the strongest advocates for reproductive freedom, because our cause is one and the same: to live our lives as we wish, without anyone imposing their judgment and will on our most personal decisions.

Finally, when it comes to economic inequality, we know that LGBT people face this reality firsthand. LGBT people of color, especially transgender people of color, have among the highest rates of poverty and HIV infections and face among the harshest discrimination in our society, whether in employment or in incarceration rates. We join our allies in demanding solutions not just to anti-LGBT discrimination but to the underlying crisis of poverty and racial injustice in America.

See also: The Georgia Voice:  Activists: LGBT communities must ally with others to ensure equality for all

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on The Normalization of TS/TG Along with the Normalization of Gay and Lesbian

UK: Housing association refuse to relocate trans woman away from phobic neighbours and say it is ‘lifestyle choice’

From Pink News :

1 February 2013

A trans woman in Middlesbrough who tried to change her housing after being harassed by neighbours was refused help by staff, who told her it was her “choice” to be transgender.

Staff of Erimus Housing told Stephanie Elliott Lowther, 46, that they could not help with her request to move away from neighbours who subjected her to transphobic abuse as her gender identity was a “lifestyle choice” that she could opt out of, according to the Northern Echo.

Ms Lowther said: “Erimus has a plaque on its wall about supporting diversity but I came away from there believing that they did not understand what being a transsexual was about.

“I was frustrated and told her that if I had any choice in the matter, I would not choose to be transgendered [sic].”

Ms Lowther sent a complaint to Erimus Housing, who apologised. They have committed to carrying out diversity training for their staff, and Ms Lowther is to help them deliver it.

“I hope this ensures others who go down this route find an easier reception when being dealt with. Only time will tell but it is encouraging to see Erimus tackling this matter head on,” she said.

Saliah Hameed, the Diversity Manager for Erimus Housing’s parent company Fabrick, said: “We are committed to equality and diversity and will not tolerate discrimination on any grounds.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on UK: Housing association refuse to relocate trans woman away from phobic neighbours and say it is ‘lifestyle choice’

The Party Isn’t Over, But It’s Well Past Midnight for Homophobia in America

From Huffington Post:


Responding to the Boy Scouts of America’s plan to ditch their ban on gay Scouts, Family Research Council President Tony Perkins said, “A departure from their long-held policies would be devastating to an organization that has prided itself on the development of character in boys.”

The problem that Perkins and other culture warriors are encountering is that each day fewer people believe their hyperbolic and hyperventilating warnings about LGBT people. The  terrifying “Gay Agenda” and “Special Rights” rhetoric worked well in the 1980s and 1990s when homosexuals were thought of as a far-off species that only existed in San Francisco’s Gay Pride parades. It was easy to spook the suburban masses by exploiting fear of the unknown.

However, now that gay people are coming out quicker than Perkins can invent new lies — and straight allies are joining our cause faster than new homophobes are minted — the outcome appears to be a foregone conclusion. The only rationale for Perkins and his ilk to continue their losing crusade is to suck every last cent out of their aging, gullible followers’ pockets before they expire.

The Boy Scouts story was featured in today’s New York Times on page A13. However, all one has to do to understand the reason for their policy shift is read the story on page A12, “Sewers, Curfews, and a Ban on Gay Bias.” It is about Vicco, a poor, abandoned Appalachian coal town in Kentucky, which has a gay mayor and a city council that just passed an anti-discrimination ordinance.

Similarly, a bill that would give same-sex couples the majority of the legal rights afforded heterosexual couples cleared a Wyoming House subcommittee by a 7-2 vote and is headed to consideration in the full House. According to the Los Angeles Times, the bill’s sponsor is State Rep. Cathy Connolly of Laramie, the first openly gay representative in Wyoming.

If Perkins’ prejudice isn’t playing in rural Kentucky and Wyoming, it soon won’t be resonating in too many places.

Sensing this trend, Dave Kochel, an Iowa Republican operative who served as senior adviser to Mitt Romney, declared this week on a local television show his support for marriage equality and said, “The culture wars are over, and the Republicans largely lost.”

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on The Party Isn’t Over, But It’s Well Past Midnight for Homophobia in America

Obama: Boy Scouts Should Be Open to Gays

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Obama: Boy Scouts Should Be Open to Gays

HHS takes final steps toward near-universal contraception coverage

From Raw Story:

By David Ferguson
Friday, February 1, 2013

Reproductive rights groups are applauding the latest announcement by the Obama administration of proposed policies aimed at providing contraceptive coverage to women employed by religious organizations. NARAL Pro-Choice America, Planned Parenthood, the Guttmacher institute and other organizations have enthusiastically greeted the news that under the provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), also known as Obamacare, steps are being taken to remove the onus of providing contraceptive coverage from employers in instances where providing such coverage would violate religious principles.

“This is very much what the administration spelled out a year ago,” said Adam Sonfield, a Senior Public Policy Associated at the Guttmacher Institute, an international nonprofit dedicated to the advancement of sexual and reproductive health. In an interview with Raw Story on Friday, he said, “There is a religious exemption for churches and other purely religious organizations. There’s also an accommodation for a broader range of nonprofit organizations that put themselves out as being religious.”

The new proposals, said Sonfield, “set up a mechanism so make the accommodation work so that that employers don’t have to touch contraception in any way. They won’t have to contract for it. They won’t have to talk to their employees about it. They won’t have to pay for it.”

Instead, a “third-party issuer” will handle issues related to birth control and contraceptives. Sonfield emphasized that for the employees, this coverage will be “seamless and automatic,” by dint of a “small, separate policy,” usually with their own insurer, dedicated solely to contraceptive coverage.

NARAL Pro-Choice America President Ilyse Hogue released a statement praising the administration.

Continue reading at:

See Also The New York Times:  Birth Control Rule Altered to Allay Religious Objections

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on HHS takes final steps toward near-universal contraception coverage

Senate Democrats Achieve 60 Votes For Violence Against Women Act

From Talking Points Memo:

Sahil Kapur
February 1, 2013

Next up in the Senate: The Violence Against Women Act.

Senate Democrats have achieved the 60 votes necessary to bypass a filibuster and reauthorize the domestic violence legislation.

“JUST TOPPED ‘magic number’ of 60 bipartisan cosponsors of my #VAWA legisl.; We’re moving briskly toward Senate vote on the Leahy-Crapo Bill,” Senate Judiciary Committee Chairman Patrick Leahy (D-VT) wrote Thursday afternoon on Twitter.

The seven Republicans who have joined 53 Democrats in support of the legislation are Sens. Kelly Ayotte (NH), Susan Collins (ME), Mike Crapo (ID), Dean Heller (NV), Mark Kirk (IL), Jerry Moran (KS) and Lisa Murkowski (AK).

A floor vote is expected as early as next week.

“The Leahy-Crapo VAWA bill seeks to protect all victims of domestic and sexual violence, including tribal women, college students, and members of the LGBT community,” Leahy said in a statement Friday. “For nearly 20 years, the programs supported by VAWA have been a lifeline to so many. They deserve swift action in Congress.”

VAWA originally passed in 1994 and was reauthorized without incident in 2000 and 2005. It expired in 2011 but has continued to receive funds. The reauthorization has fallen prey to disputes between a Senate supermajority and House Republicans on whether to expand coverage to gays, illegal immigrants, college students and Native Americans.

The Senate bill dropped a provision to expand the number of U Visas available for abused undocumented immigrants to achieve legal status, which law enforcement consider useful in helping prosecute offenders by encouraging victims to speak up. The reason for omitting that, Leahy said, was that Speaker John Boehner (R-OH) objected to it, noting that it raises some revenue and bills that do so must originate in the House.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Senate Democrats Achieve 60 Votes For Violence Against Women Act

In Hard Economy for All Ages, Older Isn’t Better … It’s Brutal

From The New York Times:

Published: February 2, 2013

Young graduates are in debt, out of work and on their parents’ couches. People in their 30s and 40s can’t afford to buy homes or have children. Retirees are earning near-zero interest on their savings.

In the current listless economy, every generation has a claim to having been most injured. But the Labor Department’s latest jobs snapshot and other recent data reports present a strong case for crowning baby boomers as the greatest victims of the recession and its grim aftermath.

These Americans in their 50s and early 60s — those near retirement age who do not yet have access to Medicare and Social Security — have lost the most earnings power of any age group, with their household incomes 10 percent below what they made when the recovery began three years ago, according to Sentier Research, a data analysis company.

Their retirement savings and home values fell sharply at the worst possible time: just before they needed to cash out. They are supporting both aged parents and unemployed young-adult children, earning them the inauspicious nickname “Generation Squeeze.”

New research suggests that they may die sooner, because their health, income security and mental well-being were battered by recession at a crucial time in their lives. A recent study by economists at Wellesley College found that people who lost their jobs in the few years before becoming eligible for Social Security lost up to three years from their life expectancy, largely because they no longer had access to affordable health care.

“If I break my wrist, I lose my house,” said Susan Zimmerman, 62, a freelance writer in Cleveland, of the distress that a medical emergency would wreak upon her finances and her quality of life. None of the three part-time jobs she has cobbled together pay benefits, and she says she is counting the days until she becomes eligible for Medicare.

In the meantime, Ms. Zimmerman has fashioned her own regimen of home remedies — including eating blue cheese instead of taking penicillin and consuming plenty of orange juice, red wine, coffee and whatever else the latest longevity studies recommend — to maintain her health, which she must do if she wants to continue paying the bills.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on In Hard Economy for All Ages, Older Isn’t Better … It’s Brutal