The Idea That Absolute Stealth Represents The Most Perfect Ideal For Post-Transsexual People

Some folks have claimed the Doctors expected transsexuals to go absolutely stealth after they had SRS.

That absolute stealth represented the best possible adjustment  for post-op women in particular.

Dr Benjamin wrote some awfully Pollyanna sort of bullshit during the 1950s.

Actually it might have sort of been possible for a few people in those days to absolutely disappear because records were kept on paper and it was easier for people to build real identification out of some pretty sketchy bits and pieces of paper.

I know because this was still sort of possible in the late 1960s early 1970s.

Credit cards and credit reporting agencies changed all that by the mid-1970s.

By the 1980s business computers were on desks and hooked to LANs and the primitive Internet.

By the 1990s everyone had a freaking computer linked to the internet.

After 2001 those of us in the US had the Department of Homeland Security, TIA and so many private information gathering agencies that Big Brother knew when you went out partying and how many drinks you had.

There are a whole lot of sisters I really look up to, mostly public figures like Andrea James, Jennifer Boylan, Julia Serano.  Not to forget lesser know sisters from the blogosphere like Mercedes Allen.

Most are more or less out, even if they don’t walk down the street wearing a t-shirt.

You kind of have to be if you want to do anything, including speak your mind on issues of public interest.

That aside I’m forced to wonder why so many of the trolls who hide behind aliases to spew hate while touting their own superiority due to their being stealth with perfect lives come off as so mentally ill and maladjusted.

As far as I can tell too many sisters have allowed themselves to be sucked into believing that they are somehow failures if they don’t manage to attain this ideal of absolute stealth.

I’ve been stealth at work and have found I manage it by never getting close to my co-workers.  I don’t socialize with or share my private life with my fellow workers.

Generally they tend to not be interested in the things I’m interested in because I’m kind of a hippie.

My circle of friends mostly know my history, after all I write and Blog about post-transsexual life.

Tonight I found out an old enemy had been asking about me and I thought WTF? My name produces page after page of Google links.  I sign my name to the things I write.  Because I am of the opinion that if you believe strongly in something you should own it by signing your name to it.

I’ve known too many sisters who withdraw from life rather than accepting that which they can not change about themselves and moving on from there.

A friend of mine died a couple of years back.  She was incredibly flamboyant and knew antiques with Road Show Appraiser astuteness.  But she unhappily withdrew from the world nearly 20 years before she passed away.

Stealth doesn’t seem like a mentally healthy way to go about dealing with transsexualism.  It comes off as being ashamed of something one was born.

Not being ashamed doesn’t mean wearing a t-shirt, more just treating it like any other thing one could be born with that makes someone different from the majority of people.

 

Friday Night Fun and Culture: Summer Time

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Friday Night Fun and Culture: Summer Time

The Olympic Struggle Over Sex

I know Alice Dreger isn’t on any sort of ten most popular list with people who read this Blog, but I’m urging you to follow the link and read this article.

From The Atlantic:   http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/07/the-olympic-struggle-over-sex/259321/

Even as it hopes to clarify the difference between male and female athletes, a new rule from the International Olympic Committee inadvertently stirs the waters.

Alice Dreger
Jul 2 2012

What is sport ultimately for? That fundamental philosophical question lies behind the debate over what to do with women athletes who were raised as girls but whose bodies seem to be unusually masculine. And in that debate, two clear philosophical camps have emerged.

One camp, led by the International Olympic Committee (IOC), believes the line imposed between putative male and putative female athletes must be biological. These folks — let’s call them the Anatomists — fully admit that sex is really complicated. They acknowledge there’s no one magical gene, chromosome, hormone, or body part that can do for us the hard work of sharp division into male and female leagues. Says the IOC in its latest declaration on the problem: “Human biology […] allows for forms of intermediate levels between the conventional categories of male and female, sometimes referred to as intersex.”

But the Anatomists still think we should base our sex division in sports on some sort of biological feature, even if it means we have to just pick one. They point out that sports require us to create all sorts of rules that aren’t simply natural and self-evident, so why not do it here, too?

And so, the IOC has just decided that, for the London Olympic Games, the rule of sex will be based on something called “functional androgens” (or “functional testosterone”). This means that an athlete who was raised a girl and identifies as a woman will be allowed to play as a woman so long as the IOC does not discover that her body makes and responds to high levels of androgens. Androgens, of which testosterone is one type, naturally occur in both male and female bodies, but higher production usually means more male-typical development.

Notice that the IOC won’t just be looking at how much androgens a woman’s body makes, but also how much her cells respond. This is because some women are born with testes that make a lot of testosterone, but they lack androgen-sensitive receptors, so the androgens have little-to-no effect on their cells. This condition is called complete Androgen Insensitivity Syndrome. Those who have it — women like Spanish hurdler Maria Patino — develop essentially as girls and women.

Continue reading at:  http://www.theatlantic.com/health/archive/2012/07/the-olympic-struggle-over-sex/259321/


Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on The Olympic Struggle Over Sex

“This is about not being treated equal”

From The Dallas Voice:  http://www.dallasvoice.com/arrest-10119663.html

Gay Dallas couple Mark Jiminez, Beau Chandler arrested after being denied marriage license at Clerk’s Office in Independence Day protest

David Taffet
July 5, 2012

Gay couple Mark “Major” Jiminez and Beau Chandler were arrested at the Dallas County Clerk’s Office on Thursday afternoon, July 5, after they were denied a marriage license and refused to leave.

The couple entered the County Records Building at about 3 p.m. with friends, TV crews and friendly police in tow.

“City police, county sheriffs and building security are all here,” Chandler said. “Nice to get their support.”

Although he was joking, most of the people the couple encountered in the building were supportive, even if they were unable to issue the license.

Sr. Cpl. Laura Martin, LGBT liaison officer for the Dallas Police Department, accompanied the group, even though she didn’t have direct jurisdiction since they were in a county building. Lt. Shelley Knight, LGBT liaison for the sheriff’s department, also followed the couple.

Continue reading at:  http://www.dallasvoice.com/arrest-10119663.html

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on “This is about not being treated equal”

Inquiry Declares Fukushima Crisis a Man-Made Disaster

From The New York Times:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/world/asia/fukushima-nuclear-crisis-a-man-made-disaster-report-says.html

By
Published: July 5, 2012

TOKYO — The nuclear accident at Fukushima was a preventable disaster rooted in government-industry collusion and the worst conformist conventions of Japanese culture, a parliamentary inquiry concluded Thursday.

The report, released by the Fukushima Nuclear Accident Independent Investigation Commission, challenged some of the main story lines that the government and the operator of the Fukushima Daiichi Nuclear Power Plant have put forward. Most notably, the report said the plant’s crucial cooling systems might have been damaged in the earthquake on March 11, 2011, not only in the ensuing tsunami. That possibility raises doubts about the safety of all the quake-prone country’s nuclear plants just as they begin to restart after a pause ordered in the wake of the Fukushima crisis.

“It was a profoundly man-made disaster — that could and should have been foreseen and prevented,” said Kiyoshi Kurokawa, the commission’s chairman, in the report’s introduction. “And its effects could have been mitigated by a more effective human response.”

While assigning widespread blame, the report avoids calling for the censure of specific executives or officials. Some citizens’ groups have demanded that executives of the plant’s operator, the Tokyo Electric Power Company, or Tepco, be investigated on charges of criminal negligence, a move that Dr. Kurokawa said Thursday was out of his panel’s purview. But criminal prosecution “is a matter for others to pursue,” he said at a news conference after the report’s release.

The very existence of an independent investigating commission — which avoids reliance on self-examination by bureaucracies that might be clouded by self-defense — is a break with precedent in Japan, but follows the pattern followed in the United States after major failures involving combinations of private companies, government oversight and technology issues. Those cases, which were cited by the panel, include the Three Mile Island nuclear accident in 1979, the Columbia and Challenger space shuttle disasters in 1986 and 2003 and the terrorist attacks on Sept. 11, 2001.

Continue reading at:  http://www.nytimes.com/2012/07/06/world/asia/fukushima-nuclear-crisis-a-man-made-disaster-report-says.html

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Inquiry Declares Fukushima Crisis a Man-Made Disaster

Government-sponsored study destroys DEA’s classification of marijuana

From Raw Story:   http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/03/government-sponsored-study-destroys-deas-classification-of-marijuana/

By Stephen C. Webster
Tuesday, July 3, 2012

A government-sponsored study published recently in The Open Neurology Journal concludes that marijuana provides much-needed relief to some chronic pain sufferers and that more clinical trials are desperately needed, utterly destroying the U.S. Drug Enforcement Agency’s (DEA) classification of the drug as having no medical uses.

While numerous prior studies have shown marijuana’s usefulness for a host of medical conditions, none have ever gone directly at the DEA’s placement of marijuana atop the schedule of controlled substances. This study, sponsored by the State of California and conducted at the University of California Center for Medicinal Cannabis Research, does precisely that, driving a stake into the heart of America’s continued war on marijuana users by calling the Schedule I placement simply “not accurate” and “not tenable.”

Reacting to the study, Paul Armentano, director of the National Organization for the Reform of Marijuana Laws (NORML), told Raw Story that the study clearly proves U.S. drug policy “is neither based upon nor guided by science.”

“In fact, it is hostile to science,” he said. “And despite the Obama Administration’s well publicized 2009 memo stating, ‘Science and the scientific process must inform and guide decisions of my Administration,’ there is little to no evidence indicating that the federal government’s ‘See no evil; hear no evil’ approach to cannabis policy is not changing any time soon.”

Continue reading at:  http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/07/03/government-sponsored-study-destroys-deas-classification-of-marijuana/

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Government-sponsored study destroys DEA’s classification of marijuana

Occupy National Gathering Brings Vision for OWS

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Occupy National Gathering Brings Vision for OWS