So what if Jenna Talackova having her right to enter a beauty contest protected opens the door for someone like fashion model, Andrej Pejic?
Does it really matter?
I don’t watch much network television. I’ve never seen American Idol and for the longest time I thought the Kardashians were one of Star Trek’s unpleasant aliens, better looking than the Ferengi but just as evil.
Gradually I learned that like Paris Hilton they had some sort of Unreality Show” and were famous for being famous.
Way back in the Camelot days when JFK was running for President and before I discovered folk music and the counter culture I thought the Miss America Pageant was the height of glamor. I really did. I wanted to be beautiful and glamorous and be up there on a stage being admired for my beauty.
Fast forward some dozen years, hanging with my sister best friends forever, the few I went through the program with and everyone of us wanted that validation. I think it goes with the territory of being a pretty transkid.
In 1967 a pageant in New York brought drag pageants up from the underground. It was turned into a movie that came out a year or so later.
That was about the time the Feminists demonstrated outside the Miss America Pageant in Atlantic City.
Beauty pageants already seemed retro and an anachronism.
Pageant producers tried to market them as offering scholarships. Feminists pointed out the bizarreness of claiming they were for scholarships while parading women around in bathing suits instead of administer SATs.
By that time I started noticing how white and homogenized these so called beauty contest were. By that time fashion models were no longer cookie cutter mannequins and had developed individuality.
A couple of years later I was in the Stanford Program and had met an extremely beautiful sister, a Philappina -American who was a fashion model. I noticed how a few of us were actually among the prettiest girls/women in most settings.
That was what encouraged some of us to come out really young.
I wasn’t into the artifice of beauty and over the years I’ve seen that pretty and beauty aren’t as easily defined as these pageants would have you believe.
The thing that gets me is that these contests are about who projects or meets an artificial standard of femininity.
When you start excluding transsexuals either post-op or pre-op, for that matter even transgender sisters what does that project.
I’ve been rightly fascinated with this “cotton ceiling” concept. In part because it is about setting some sort of reason for rejecting people due to their being or having been labeled with a trans-prefixed word.
Exclusion seems like rigging the contest out of fear that a transsexual or perish the thought transgender woman might be prettier and better project this artificial ideal of sexuality and femininity than someone assigned female at birth or for that matter presently female.
Now watching this play out is sort of a side attraction to all the majorly serious shit that is going on. I actually consider the “Cotton Ceiling” something far more important and as having much more impact on the lives of all TS/TG people. BTW it also affects heterosexual sisters.
Actress, producer and transgender advocate; co-creator and star, ‘TRANSform Me’
I was very moved when I found out that the Miss Universe organization would allow Jenna Talackova to compete, reversing their earlier decision to disqualify her because she is transgender. The organization’s statement asserted that she will be allowed to compete only “provided she meets the legal gender recognition requirements of Canada, and the standards established by other international competitions.” It’s wonderful that the organization has stated that it will allow Jenna to compete, but it needs to go further. The Miss Universe organization needs to make a public statement saying that it is working to revise its policy once and for all so that the competition is open to all women, and it must set a deadline for the written revision of the policy.
As the media noise gets louder, I believe it’s essential that we remember that this is a case about equality, that no one should have a glass ceiling on their dreams. This is an opportunity for the Miss Universe organization to make a statement about inclusion. In a discussion about this case on my Facebook page, a number of transgender women remarked that “rules are rules.” Many stated that trans women have our own beauty pageants. Many countered my call for inclusion, asking, “Should we allow non-trans women to enter pageants that until now have been reserved for trans women?” Reading these comments, I couldn’t help but think about the Jim Crow laws, which mandated in Southern states after the Civil War that in all public facilities African Americans were to have “separate but equal” access. We now know that separate was never equal. African Americans were second-class citizens. Sometimes rules are discriminatory and need to be changed.
The Jenna Talackova case reminds us that transgender people are often also treated as second-class citizens in our society, and that by changing the rules, we begin to undo the systemic discrimination that trans people experience. Coko Williams, a trans woman, was found dead in Detroit early in the morning on Tuesday, April 3. It was reported that her throat had been slashed and that she had been shot at least once. A Detroit FOX News affiliate’s story on the slaying focused on the crime-ridden neighborhood, not the loss of a human life. The story also misgendered Coko, using incorrect pronouns to refer to her, which happens all too often in news stories about trans people. The story also contained an interview with a witness who suggested that Coko had it coming because she was trans. Another site reporting on this story used a photo of trash to accompany the story, trash a resident of the neighborhood had collected, containing used syringes, bullet casings, and empty liquor bottles, in a story about the murder of a human being… a photo of trash! To be fair, this site was merely reproducing this image from the original FOX 2 story. But what a message this sends to the general population and to trans people specifically about the value of our lives, a photo of trash to accompany a story about the brutal murder of a trans woman.
Two articles from The Vancouver Sun:
From The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/04/opinion/calling-radicalism-by-its-name.html
April 3, 2012
President Obama’s fruitless three-year search for compromise with the Republicans ended in a thunderclap of a speech on Tuesday, as he denounced the party and its presidential candidates for cruelty and extremism. He accused his opponents of imposing on the country a “radical vision” that “is antithetical to our entire history as a land of opportunity.”
Mitt Romney, the Republican presidential front-runner, has embraced a House budget plan that is little more than “thinly veiled social Darwinism,” the president said, a “Trojan horse” disguised as deficit reduction that would hurt middle- and lower-income Americans.
“By gutting the very things we need to grow an economy that’s built to last — education and training, research and development, our infrastructure — it is a prescription for decline,” he said, speaking to a group of Associated Press editors and reporters in Washington.
Mr. Obama has, in recent months, urged Republicans to put aside their destructive agenda. But, in this speech, he finally conceded that the party has demonstrated no interest in the values of compromise and realism. Even Ronald Reagan, who raised taxes in multiple budget deals, “could not get through a Republican primary today,” Mr. Obama said. While Democrats have repeatedly shown a willingness to cut entitlements and have agreed to trillions in domestic spending cuts, he said, Republicans won’t agree to any tax increases and, in fact, want to shower the rich with even more tax cuts.
The speech was the first time that Mr. Obama linked Mr. Romney, by name, to his party’s dishonest budget and discredited trickle-down policies. As Mr. Obama pointed out, Mr. Romney described as “marvelous” a budget that would drastically cut student financial aid, medical research, Head Start classrooms and environmental protections. Mr. Obama further ridiculed the budget’s deficit-cutting goal as “laughable” because it refuses to acknowledge the need for new revenues.
Complete article at: http://www.nytimes.com/2012/04/04/opinion/calling-radicalism-by-its-name.html
By Matt Taibbi
April 3, 2012
An amazing lawsuit was filed in New York last week. It seems Mike Bloomberg’s notorious “stop-and-frisk” policy – known colloquially in these parts by silently-cheering white voters as the “Let’s have cops feel up any nonwhite person caught walking in the wrong neighborhood” policy – isn’t even the most repressive search policy in the NYPD arsenal.
Bloomberg, that great crossover Republican, has long been celebrated by the Upper West Side bourgeoisie for his enlightened views on gay rights and the environment, but also targeted for criticism by civil rights activists because of stop-and-frisk, a program that led to a record 684,330 street searches just last year.
Now he’s under fire for a program he inherited, which goes by the darkly Bushian name of the “Clean Halls program.” In effect since 1991, it allows police to execute so-called “vertical patrols” by going up into private buildings and conducting stop-and-frisk searches in hallways – with the landlord’s permission.
According to the NYCLU, which filed the suit, “virtually every private apartment building [in the Bronx] is enrolled in the program,” and “in Manhattan alone, there are at least 3,895 Clean Halls Buildings.” Referring to the NYPD’s own data, the complaint says police conducted 240,000 “vertical patrols” in the year 2003 alone.
If you live in a Clean Halls building, you can’t even go out to take out the trash without carrying an ID – and even that might not be enough. If you go out for any reason, there may be police in the hallways, demanding that you explain yourself, and insisting, in brazenly illegal and unconstitutional fashion, on searches of your person.
by Peter Cassels
Wednesday Apr 4, 2012
Longtime activist Cleve Jones told EDGE during a wide-ranging interview in Boston on Monday that he fears the LGBT movement may be losing its way and that corporate money has too strong an influence.
A close friend of Harvey Milk, the San Francisco supervisor assassinated in 1978, Jones was portrayed by Emile Hirsch is the Oscar-winning 2008 movie “Milk.”
He went on to found the NAMES Project AIDS Memorial Quilt in 1987. The project grew to become the world’s largest community arts project, memorializing the lives of more than 85,000 Americans who died from HIV/AIDS.
Jones has been on the staff of UNITE HERE, a union representing workers in the hospitality and related industries in the United States and Canada, for the last six years. He visited Boston to speak to Local 26 members and MassEquality and described his mission as strengthening the coalition between the LGBT and labor movements.
“One of the most important and central questions is whether or not we are a progressive movement and whether we care about other communities and other issues,” said Jones. “The big philosophical question is what kind of movement we want this to be now that we appear to winning. A movement that seeks to advance only its own members is going to accomplish little. I want to be in a movement that transforms the lives of millions of people.”
Jones said he worries about corporations that pour large amounts of money into the Human Rights Campaign, the National Gay and Lesbian Task Force and other national LGBT organizations. Citing HRC’s appointment of Goldman Sachs CEO Lloyd Blankfein as a spokesperson for its national marriage equality campaign, he expressed fears that LGBT groups have become beholden to corporations.