Transsexual is not an Honorific

I am not a transsexual writer.  I am not a transsexual blogger. I am not transsexual photographer.

I am a writer because I write. I am a blogger because I blog. I am a photographer because I do photography although I do that less these days I nonetheless have a body of work.

Transsexualism is something I had an operation to treat.  I have a hard time describing myself and those other people who also had sex reassignment saurgery as a class or even our need for that surgery making us into a class.

So many different personalities, social classes, ethnicities, interests.  I’m friends with quite a few sisters and more than a few brothers.

We are all so different.

I’m labeled a “transsexual separatist” for refusing to go along with the cult like beliefs of the Transgender Borg, as though being part of the Borg was mandatory or again as though transsexual were an honorific, part of a title like transsexual writer.

Instead I simply look at the transgender community and think their ideology fails to make any sense.  I don’t like their bullying of people, I don’t like their tactics and I don’t feel much in common with those who express that ideology.

But calling me and other artists who are many years post-op “transsexual artist” instead of just artists, writers, musicians etc is like continuing to describe some one who left say Catholicism fifty years ago as a Catholic based on the Catholic ideology of once a Catholic always a Catholic unless they decide to excommunicate you.

I remember when Ms. was introduced as an honorific for women who rejected being defined as being owned by a man or open to claiming by a man.

I remember the resistance that met women who didn’t wish to be identified according to their being in a legally recognized relationship with a man.

I didn’t have SRS with the intention of spending my life in the world behind the pink door inhabited by gender queers, transvestites, fetishists, full time transgender warriors etc.  I had a sex change operation with the intent of being an ordinary left wing hippie woman more interested in the world of art than Transworld, or for that matter the gay and lesbian world, even though I eventually came out as lesbian.

To this day I’d rather go to a mixed event than a lesbian event.  Hell I’d rather go to Willie’s Picnic than a Womyn’s Music Festival, SXSW than MWMF.

Last year I started using “post-transsexual” to describe what happens for many of us a few years after surgery.  Burn-out is another way of putting it.  Hanging out in Transworld is like being beset by a horde of hungry ghosts all grabbing and pulling at you demanding something you don’t have to give them, mostly because what they want is found within themselves.

I hate the label transsexual or transgender because I’ve resolved those issues, made my peace with them and moved on.

If someone reads what I have to offer and gets something that helps them then it’s great.  Hopefully  someone gets something from what I write.

But I also get to live my life on my own terms and one of those is not being defined by an operation I had some forty years ago.

I Love Abortion: Implying Otherwise Accomplishes Nothing for Women’s Rights

From RH Reality Check:

by Jessica DelBalzo
March 14, 2012

I love abortion. I don’t accept it. I don’t view it as a necessary evil. I embrace it. I donate to abortion funds. I write about how important it is to make sure that every woman has access to safe, legal abortion services. I have bumper stickers and buttons and t-shirts proclaiming my support for reproductive freedom. I love abortion.

And I bristle every time a fellow activist uses a trendy catch-phrase or rallying cry meant to placate pro-lifers. The first of these, “Make abortion safe, legal, and rare!” has been used for decades as a call for abortion rights.

Safe and legal are concepts I fully support, but rare is something I cannot abide. I understand the theoretical mindset: it is better for a woman to prevent an unwanted pregnancy than to bear the physical and financial burden of an abortion. While my own abortion involved very little pain and a minimal financial expense, one which my ex-boyfriend was willing to share with me, even I can admit that using condoms or the pill is preferable to eight weeks of nausea and weight gain. Contraception is a valuable tool.

However, there is no need to suggest that abortion be rare. To say so implies a value judgement, promoting the idea that abortion is somehow distasteful or immoral and should be avoided. Even with affordable, accessible birth control, there will be user errors, condoms that break, moments of spontaneity. The best contraceptive access in the world won’t change the fact that we are merely human and imperfect in our routines. The best access in the world also won’t change the fact that some women are raped, while others find that even wanted pregnancies sometimes need to be terminated for the woman’s well-being or to avoid birthing a child with painful or unmanageable disabilities. Women who find themselves facing any of these situations shouldn’t feel guilty for failing to keep the numbers low.

It stands to reason that if we ensure contraception is both readily available and easily affordable for sexually active women of all ages, the need for abortion may decrease as a result. That would be a laudable accomplishment and an indication of social progress for an America otherwise plagued by anti-feminist, religious conservatism known for shaming women’s sexuality.

Continue reading at:

We Have to Choose What Kind of a People We Are

From Huffington Post:


Even while we see jobs coming back, the tsunami created by the Great Recession is hitting cities and counties with full force. Suffolk County, one of the largest New York counties, has declared a financial emergency. Stockton, Calif., a city of 300,000, is on the verge of bankruptcy.

As the cities go belly up, the 1 percent are back. A new report by Emmanuel Saez, the nation’s leading academic expert on income inequality, shows that the top 1 percent captured a staggering 93 percent of all the real income growth in 2010. The bottom 99 percent captured only 0.2 percent after losing nearly 12 percent from 2007-09. For the 99 percent, the loses in the Great Recession erased all income gains since the last recession in 2002.

In cities, the crisis is forcing harsh cuts in services. As New York City Mayor Michael R. Bloomberg put it, “Towns and counties across the state are starting to have to make the real choices — fewer cops, fewer firefighters, slower ambulance response, less teachers.”

Cities and counties could muffle the effect for a couple of years, but now, the day of reckoning is hitting — and hitting hard.

Lower property values, the result of the housing bubble crash, are now being registered in tax valuations. Millions were lost as the banks trampled the law while dodging recording and transfer fees on mortgages. Unemployment and poverty put greater pressure on budgets, particularly on health care through Medicaid. The losses suffered by pension funds force higher payments by public employers. The high unemployment economy generates lower sales and income tax revenues.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on We Have to Choose What Kind of a People We Are

Bank of America: Too Crooked to Fail

From Rolling Stone:

The bank has defrauded everyone from investors and insurers to homeowners and the unemployed. So why does the government keep bailing it out?

By Matt Taibbi
March 14, 2012

At least Bank of America got its name right. The ultimate Too Big to Fail bank really is America, a hypergluttonous ward of the state whose limitless fraud and criminal conspiracies we’ll all be paying for until the end of time. Did you hear about the plot to rig global interest rates? The $137 million fine for bilking needy schools and cities? The ingenious plan to suck multiple fees out of the unemployment checks of jobless workers? Take your eyes off them for 10 seconds and guaranteed, they’ll be into some shit again: This bank is like the world’s worst-behaved teenager, taking your car and running over kittens and fire hydrants on the way to Vegas for the weekend, maxing out your credit cards in the three days you spend at your aunt’s funeral. They’re out of control, yet they’ll never do time or go out of business, because the government remains creepily committed to their survival, like overindulgent parents who refuse to believe their 40-year-old live-at-home son could possibly be responsible for those dead hookers in the backyard.

It’s been four years since the government, in the name of preventing a depression, saved this megabank from ruin by pumping $45 billion of taxpayer money into its arm. Since then, the Obama administration has looked the other way as the bank committed an astonishing variety of crimes – some elaborate and brilliant in their conception, some so crude that they’d be beneath your average street thug. Bank of America has systematically ripped off almost everyone with whom it has a significant business relationship, cheating investors, insurers, depositors, homeowners, shareholders, pensioners and taxpayers. It brought tens of thousands of Americans to foreclosure court using bogus, “robo-signed” evidence – a type of mass perjury that it helped pioneer. It hawked worthless mortgages to dozens of unions and state pension funds, draining them of hundreds of millions in value. And when it wasn’t ripping off workers and pensioners, it was helping to push insurance giants like AMBAC into bankruptcy by fraudulently inducing them to spend hundreds of millions insuring those same worthless mortgages.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Bank of America: Too Crooked to Fail

#F29 Matt Taibbi on Bank of America | Occupy Wall Street Video

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on #F29 Matt Taibbi on Bank of America | Occupy Wall Street Video

Hire-and-fire labour law changes won’t ease Spain’s employment crisis

From The Guardian UK:

A 23% jobless total, with nearly 50% youth unemployment, is the result of historical, systemic problems in the wider economy, Wednesday 14 March 2012

On Tuesday Spanish politicians claimed a political victory after winning concessions in their tussle over the country’s deficit reduction plans. But on the streets of Spain, all is not well. Tens of thousands of union supporters marched against changes to the country’s labour laws on Sunday, and they plan a general strike for 29 March if the ruling right-of-centre People’s party (PP) doesn’t negotiate with them.

Some PP members have suggested that striking would be unpatriotic, damaging Spain’s international reputation. At the weekend general secretary María Dolores de Cospedal said protesters were being egged on by the Socialist opposition and said the strikers should think about the country’s unemployed, who would be given a chance through the latest reform. The head of the CCOO union, Ignacio Fernández Toxo, said the unemployed were being used as “blackmail” to justify scrapping workers’ rights.

We’ve been here before. The last socialist government also changed labour laws in 2010 and forced through public sector wage cuts, alienating their traditional allies and resulting in a general strike.

Overhauling the country’s hiring and firing laws is partly seen as a firewall to prevent Spain from being sucked the way of Greece, Ireland and Portugal.

Like former prime minister José Luis Rodríguez Zapatero, Mariano Rajoy is likely stick to his guns to show Spain is serious about structural reform. He says it’s necessary to avoid future crises resulting in the mass job losses of this one, which has left the country with the highest unemployment in the EU, at about 23%.

But the latest change to the law – already in force after being introduced by decree last month – won’t be a solution on its own. In good times and bad, Spain has higher than average unemployment, and youth unemployment (now at almost 50%) is a particular problem.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Hire-and-fire labour law changes won’t ease Spain’s employment crisis

Don’t Tread on Us

From The New York Times:

Published: March 13, 2012

Hillary Clinton has fought for women’s rights around the world. But who would have dreamed that she would have to fight for them at home?

“Why extremists always focus on women remains a mystery to me,” she told an adoring crowd at the Women in the World Summit at Lincoln Center on Saturday. “But they all seem to. It doesn’t matter what country they’re in or what religion they claim. They want to control women. They want to control how we dress. They want to control how we act. They even want to control the decisions we make about our own health and bodies.

“Yes,” she continued to applause, “it is hard to believe that even here at home, we have to stand up for women’s rights and reject efforts to marginalize any one of us, because America needs to set an example for the entire world.”

As secretary of state, Clinton is supposed to stay out of domestic politics. But this was a moment pregnant with possibility, a titanic clash of the Inevitable (Hillary) and the Indefensible (Republican cavemen).

The attempt by Republican men to wrestle American women back into chastity belts has not only breathed life into President Obama, it has roused and riled Hillary. And that could turn out to be the most dangerous thing the wildly self-destructive G.O.P. leaders have done.

In some kind of insane bout of mass misogyny, Republicans are hounding out the women voters — including Republicans and independents — who helped them gain control of the House in 2010.

Continue reading at:

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Don’t Tread on Us