Women Born Transsexual

Because everyone knows religion is really about the exercise of racism, homophobia and misogyny.

Time to remove religion from the position of being a protected class.  It isn’t like you are born with it, religion is a product of indoctrination and you can change it with counseling and a desire to change.

I did.  I was indoctrinated into Catholicism but I managed to discover free though and break free from the enslavement of superstition and belief in invisible magic sky beings.  I became and atheist and so could they.

We pander to these people with their odd beliefs way too much.

From The New York Times: http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/us/for-bishops-a-battle-over-whose-rights-prevail.html?_r=1&hp

By LAURIE GOODSTEIN
Published: December 28, 2011

Catholic Charities in Illinois has served for more than 40 years as a major link in the state’s social service network for poor and neglected children. But now most of the Catholic Charities affiliates in Illinois are closing down rather than comply with a new requirement that says they can no longer receive state money if they turn away same-sex couples as potential foster careand adoptive parents.

For the nation’s Roman Catholic bishops, the outcome is a prime example of what they see as an escalating campaign by the government to trample on their religious freedom while expanding the rights of gay people. The idea that religious Americans are now the victims of government-backed persecution is now a frequent theme not just for Catholic bishops, but also for Republican presidential candidates and conservative evangelicals.

“In the name of tolerance, we’re not being tolerated,” said Bishop Thomas J. Paprocki of the Diocese of Springfield, Ill., a civil and canon lawyer who helped drive the church’s losing battle to retain its state contracts for foster care and adoption services.

The Illinois experience indicates that the bishops face formidable opponents who also claim to have justice and the Constitution on their side. They include not only gay rights advocates, but also many religious believers and churches that support gay equality (some Catholic legislators among them). They frame the issue as a matter of civil rights, saying that Catholic Charities was using taxpayer money to discriminate against same-sex couples.

Continue reading at:   http://www.nytimes.com/2011/12/29/us/for-bishops-a-battle-over-whose-rights-prevail.html?_r=1&hp

While the right wing brands liberals as “Libtards” I’ve always thought the real “Libtards” were Libertarians, particularly those who claim to be Libertarian based on the supposed positions of Libertarianism regarding drug illegality.

That one of those positions that causes me to think the person who claims to be a Libertarian based on access to drugs has consumed too many drugs.

All surface and no substance.  Libertarianism is more libertine than liberal.  It is anarchism’s evil twin.

I first became aware of it while reading “American Opinion” (John Birch Society) in the college library back in the 1960s.  It is the dance partner of Ayn Rand’s “Objectivity” and realy doesn’r espouse freedom for all but rather free rein for the elite, the rich and powerful to act totally in their own personal self-interest and fuck everyone else.

It’s nice to be king.  It sucks to be a slave to tyranny and Libertarianism doesn’t extend the same rights to the poor that it extends to the rich.  While the rich are free to use any power they happen to have to oppress the masses the masses are not permitted to organize to resist that power.

Libertarianism is an oligarchy on crack.

Lately I’ve been getting into it with morons who think Ron Paul is an alternative to Obama.

He isn’t and the one thing I find comforting is that he is unlikely to go anywhere.

From Salon:   http://www.salon.com/2011/08/30/lind_libertariansim/

The experience of every modern democratic nation-state proves that libertarianism is incompatible with democracy

From Alternet:  http://www.alternet.org/story/153588/are_psychiatrists_inventing_mental_illnesses_to_feed_americans_more_pills/

Mental health professionals say new diagnoses will lead to overmedication.

By Rob Waters 
December 27, 2011

Anyone who’s ever tried to get reimbursed by a health insurance company after seeing a psychiatrist or psychotherapist, or taking a child or teenager to one, has no doubt noticed the incomprehensible numbers that appear on the clinician’s statement, perhaps preceding some slightly less imponderable phrase.

Maybe you are a 296.22 (major depressive disorder, single episode, mild) or a 300.00 (anxiety disorder NOS–not otherwise specified). Hopefully, you are not a 301.83 (borderline personality disorder). Your kid might be a 313.81 (oppositional defiant disorder) or, more likely, a 314.01 (attention deficit hyperactivity disorder, predominantly hyperactive-impulsive type).

Since 1952, a tome called the Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorders, better known as the DSM, has been reducing to a few digits the psychological malady said to afflict a patient. This bible of mental health treatment, published by the American Psychiatric Association (APA), provides a list and description of every mental health condition known to—or invented by—psychiatry, from histrionic personality disorder (301.50) to transvestic fetishism (302.3).

Over the decades, the manual, adapted from a guide for mental diseases developed by Army and Navy psychiatrists, has ballooned. The number of listed disorders tripled to nearly 300. A few have been discredited and dumped along the way. Most famous were battles over the inclusion of homosexuality. Successive iterations of the manual listed homosexuality as a “sociopathic personality disturbance,” then modified that to describe a more limited “sexual orientation disturbance” among people who were “in conflict with” their attraction to people of the same sex. That was later replaced by a disorder called “ego-dystonic homosexuality,” applied to those whose homosexual arousal was a source of distress. That item was dropped in the DSM-III-R, published in 1987.

Continue reading at:  http://www.alternet.org/story/153588/are_psychiatrists_inventing_mental_illnesses_to_feed_americans_more_pills/

From Digital Journal: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/316760

By Arthur Weinreb
Dec 27, 2011
Detroit – Detroit Police say three of the four women whose bodies were found in vehicle trunks in the past eight days had posted ads in the adult services section of Backpage.com.

Yesterday afternoon, Detroit Police Chief Ralph Godbee issued a public safety announcement. Godbee said that with the increased use of the Internet and social media, police have an obligation to identify any website that may potentially pose a threat to individuals.

On the afternoon of Dec. 19, the bodies of two women were found in the trunk of a car parked in the driveway of a vacant home. According to police there no obvious signs of trauma on the bodies. At 1 a.m. on Christmas Day, firefighters responded to a call concerning a vehicle fire. After the fire was put out, firefighters found the bodies of two women in the trunk of the 1997 Buick LaSabre.
Read more: http://www.digitaljournal.com/article/316760

Detroit police link burned bodies to adult ads

From Raw Story:  http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/27/detroit-police-link-burned-bodies-to-adult-ads/

By Stephen C. Webster
Tuesday, December 27, 2011

Four women whose bodies were found in the trunks of burning cars over the last two weeks have been connected to adult advertisements on Backpage.com, police said Monday.

The two most recent victims were found early on Christmas morning, bodies burned beyond recognition, police said. Two other victims were discovered a week prior to Christmas.

All four of the women were black females in their 20s, and police said they did not appear to have been physically abused. A coroner had yet to determine the cause of death.

Continue reading at:   http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2011/12/27/detroit-police-link-burned-bodies-to-adult-ads/

From Alternet:  http://www.alternet.org/story/153567/how_the_feds_fueled_the_militarization_of_police/

Billions in post-9/11 taxpayer dollars have paid for combat-style gear on display in the Occupy crackdowns.

By Justin Elliott
December 26, 2011

The militarization of America’s metropolitan police forces was on full display in recent months as police from Los Angeles to New York cracked down on Occupy protests, decked out in full SWAT gear and occasionally using strange pieces of military hardware.

Less well known is that police forces in small towns and far-flung cities have also been stocking up on heavy equipment in the years since Sept. 11, 2001.

In spite of strained city and state budgets in local years, the trend has continued thanks to generous federal grants. According to a new story by the Center for Investigative Reporting, $34 billion in federal grant money has financed the past decade’s shopping spree.

To learn more about the trend, I spoke with G.W. Schultz, who co-authored the story with Andrew Becker. (Also worth a look is the slide showaccompanying the story.)

You start your piece with Fargo, N.D., where the police have a “$256,643 armored truck, complete with a rotating turret,” kevlar helmets and assault rifles in their squad cars. What did they say when you asked why they need this kind of heavy equipment?

Their view is that they need to be as prepared as a city like New York. We’ve been studying the grant programs for a while. You see this in city after city. Everyone has got an explanation for why they need more and not less grant money. I grew up in Tulsa; there’s still a lot of sensitivity around the Oklahoma City bombing. So the attitude is, “Look, we could have a similar attack and we need to be ready for it.” Now I live in Austin. The attitude here is, we could have an incident like the one in which a guy smashed his plane into the IRS building a few years ago, or the one in which a guy started shooting people from a tower at the Uniersity of Texas a few decades ago. Every city has an answer like that. The approach to security spending is based on speculation about what could happen, however remote. That attitude enables you to buy everything without limit because you can never attain 100 percent security.

Continue reading at:   http://www.alternet.org/story/153567/how_the_feds_fueled_the_militarization_of_police/

These terms are negative and reinforce a negative opinion of not only transsexual women and men but Transgender women and men.

If we are going to call gay men on using these terms perhaps it is time to stop using them .  That includes in the Adult Video World as well as having serious minded activist use terms like “gender-variant”.  Our genders our our own, they aren’t a variant unless you accept some rigid religious/patriarchal definition of gender.

Time to stop the entire freakification game.

That goes for us as well as non-TS/non-TG people.

Why We Shouldn’t Use the Word ‘Tranny’

From Huffington Post:    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lance-bass/why-we-shouldnt-use-the-word-tranny_b_1168078.html

Lance Bass
Posted: 12/23/11

Let me start this off with two very important words that I truly mean from the bottom of my heart: I’m sorry. I’m sorry to anyone who was offended or hurt by my use of the word “trannies” while appearing earlier this week on Access Hollywood Live.

Let me share what I have learned in the last 24 hours. I have learned, thanks to Glaad.org‘s website, that the term “tranny” is used as a dehumanizing slur to describe transgender individuals and is oftentimes the last word someone hears before they are brutally attacked. Similar to the anti-gay F-word, the term “tranny” is commonly used to humiliate and degrade transgender individuals.

I can tell you with all sincerity that I had no idea.

I often hear the term used on Logo’s RuPaul’s Drag Race and spent an entire summer listening to Christian Siriano use the phrase “hot tranny mess” on Lifetime’s Project Runway. In my definition, I was referring to the flamboyant and hilarious drag queens and transvestites who play on Christopher Street in New York City, some of whom I even call friends. When I use the word “tranny,” I am picturing Tim Curry’s Frank-N-Furter character in The Rocky Horror Picture Show, or the wildly hilarious Eddie Izzard. I certainly don’t think of Chaz Bono or someone questioning the body they were born into.

Continue reading at:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/lance-bass/why-we-shouldnt-use-the-word-tranny_b_1168078.html