Schlafly: Violence Against Women Act Protects Women Too Much

From Right Wing Watch:  http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/schlafly-violence-against-women-act-protects-women-too-much

Submitted by Brian Tashman
July 12, 2011

Eagle Forum’s Phyllis Schlafly wants Congress to hold up the reauthorization of the Violence Against Women Act until it is altered so that it doesn’t benefit women. Schlafly, a long-time critic of the landmark law who believes that married women cannot be raped by their husbands, contends that the Violence Against Women Act goes too far in protecting women from abusive spouses and that the law is merely a feminist plot to tear down men:

The Violence Against Women Act (VAWA), now up for reauthorization, is in major need of revision. Its billion-dollar-a-year price tag spent by the radical feminists to pursue their ideology and goals (known as feminist pork) make it an embarrassment to members of Congress who voted for it.

For 30 years, the feminists have been pretending that their goal is to abolish all sex discrimination, eliminating all gender differences no matter how reasonable. When it comes to domestic violence, however, feminist dogma preaches that there is an innate gender difference: Men are naturally batterers, and women are naturally victims (i.e., gender profiling).

Starting with its title, VAWA is just about as sex discriminatory as legislation can get. It is written and implemented to oppose the abuse of women and to punish men.

Continue reading at:   http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/schlafly-violence-against-women-act-protects-women-too-much

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Schlafly: Violence Against Women Act Protects Women Too Much
%d bloggers like this: