Cops: Man stoned to death: Murderer tries to use the lie of gay advances defense

I lay this one at the door of Taliban Christianity and their indoctrinating their followers with the idea that gays and lesbians should be murdered by stoning.  These death cults preach genocide against gay and lesbian people.

From MSNBC: http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42158884/ns/local_news-philadelphia_pa/

A 28-year-old man has been charged with murder after telling police that he stoned a 70-year-old man to death for making homosexual advances toward him, authorities say.

John Joe Thomas, 28, of Sunshine Road in Upper Darby, spent almost every day with 70-year-old Murray Seidman at Seidman’s Lansdowne home, police say. Days before Seidman’s body was found on Jan. 12, Thomas allegedly beat Seidman to death with a sock full of rocks.

Thomas reportedly told authorities that he read in the Old Testament that homosexuals should be stoned to death. When Seidman allegedly made homosexual advances toward him over a period of time, Thomas said he received a message in his prayers that he must end Seidman’s life, according to court documents.

Police say that Thomas struck Seidman in the head about 10 times with the sock of rocks. Thomas left Seidman dead in his apartment, and then threw his bloody clothing and the bloody sock in a dumpster, according to authorities.

<snip>

Thomas is being held on first-degree murder charges.

Complete story at:   http://www.msnbc.msn.com/id/42158884/ns/local_news-philadelphia_pa/

By the way, his attempted justification should be treated as a confession.  The proper response to an unwanted sexual advance is saying no.  Particularly given how women aren’t allowed to kill creepy men who refuse to take no for an answer or hunt the men who have raped them down an kill them.

One Response to “Cops: Man stoned to death: Murderer tries to use the lie of gay advances defense”

  1. tinagrrl Says:

    Can we stone men who make unwanted advances? Can we? Huh, please, can we?

    I no longer have that problem — except for some really ambitious, and (I guess) horny senior citizens – but they are usually very gentle — and don’t deserve stoning (my opinion only).

    I have one question — does hitting them with a lead projectile from a gunpowder operated weapon count as “stoning”? Would that fulfill “biblical requirements”? Would it upset “men’s rights advocates”?

    After all, they claim they want a return to “traditional values” – where men were “gentlemen”, opened doors, etc. Does that mean we can “stone” them when they make unwanted advances? Or does their return to “traditional values” mean women have NO RIGHTS AT ALL — that they are “under the protection” of some man – or not protected at all?

    I find it amazing how many “liberal”, “liberated”, men are still in the stone age when it comes to women’s rights — the comic Bill Maher is one of those men.

    There are many, many, others.

    Can you say PIGS?


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: