Women Born Transsexual

Their own words show their Christo-Fascism

From care2.com

http://www.care2.com/causes/politics/blog/american/

posted by: Tracy Viselli

By Sophia

02/02/2010 at 8:26am

There follows a typical list of statements used mainly against three minority groups in the media on the comments sections of articles.
These three groups are Transgender people, Transsexual people and Intersex people, All three are fundamentally different but the grunts in the media like to class them all as the same, for reasons which will become evident.

1: “Surgery does not make a man or a woman!”

The problem with this statement is quite simple, the grunts are not being entirely truthful. When they say this (Often to transsexual people) the grunts are very keen not to mention the grunts pay taxes, quite happily to carry out very similar procedures on intersex children, who neither consent to such surgery or ask for it.

2: “Why should we pay taxes to feed a delusion.”

Again the grunts usually aim this at transsexual people (Their favorite target) and talk of “surgery being used to feed a delusion” Again who’s delusion is being fed when intersex children are surgically mutilated? Who’s delusion is it when on the strength of that non consented to surgery birth documentation is fully amended to fit? Not partially by some gender recognition process, but in entirety. What is every birth certificate reading absolutely “Male” or “Female” if it is not a delusion?

3: “Men are XY and Women are XX.”

This is perhaps the most blatant lie of them all, sex is determined by DNA not the packaging (Chromosomes). If the DNA is not able to produce a male or female phenotype, regardless of the packaging then that is that. It is like describing a library on the way one bookshelf looks.

4: “G-d does not make mistakes”

So G-d makes people endure these hellish situations on purpose then? For what reason? So the grunts have got a bone to chew on?

5: “People are the product of their upbringing, those raised as girls are women those raised as boys are men.”

David Reimer and a lot of intersex people would not agree. The problem I have with the mainly “Liberal” media spouting this line of reasoning (Social fatalism) is that this model was actually tested by Dr John Money during the 1960’s and 1970’s and it failed. With horrific results.

6: “We need to deconstruct the gender binary and then all these minority groups will just go away.”

Being born with ambiguous genitalia won’t go away, nor will things that affect the other groups. And if in getting rid of the “Gender binary” you are strict about the two sex system, you will never get rid of the gender binary.

7: “This is political correctness gone mad!”

That one only gets wheeled out when it is convenient. When it comes to “Religious tolerance” the statement: “It is our human right to exclude, punish, torment and hammer those we hate as an act of religious duty!” is what exactly? Political correctness gone mad of course.

8: “Parents of transgender children who let them have their way are abusing their children!”

This is of course literally what it says, when mutilating intersex children it is to make it clear that the child must never have what they want, (See argument 1) The only real child abusers are those who would rid their child of autonomy and free will in order to impose some sex status (That is that sort of abuse is it not?)

9: “G-d created Adam and Eve and did so for his purposes”

Resorting to “I am an atheist” tends not to work, the answer to this one is simple If G-d is the G-d of both Adam and Eve and both were made in
G-d’s image, then G-d is what exactly? Certainly not just “He” (Genesis 1:27 read properly)

10: “It is not natural!”

Nor is imposing a false ideal of what a man or a woman is when it is plainly obvious by now that in nature, sex dimorphism is not as clear cut as it is claimed to be.

Red Prada Pump Wearing Former Hitler Youth Turned Pope sees equality as threat to his using superstition to maintain his power

Isn’t it just precious?  Pope Adolf doesn’t believe in equality.  Diderot was right.   Humankind will only be free when the last oligarch is strangled with the guts of the last priest. (paraphrase)

A man who heads a major man-boy love pedophile conspiracy has the nerve to preach inequality.

Tax the bloody churches like the businesses they are.

From the Daily Mail

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/worldnews/article-1247706/Pope-condemns-Harriet-Harman-equality-drive-violation-natural-law.html#

Simon Caldwell
Last updated at 6:51 AM on 02nd February 2010

Pope Benedict XVI: Visiting Britain in September

The Pope yesterday made an unprecedented attack on Britain’s equality legislation, claiming Harriet Harman’s attempts to bring in new laws enforced sinful behaviour.

Benedict XVl condemned Labour’s Equality Bill in extraordinary terms as an assault on the ‘natural law’ of Christianity  –  in other words a sin.

His remarks came in a speech at the Vatican moments after he confirmed he will visit the UK in September.

Despite praising Britain’s ‘firm commitment to equality of opportunity for all members of society’, the world’s most powerful religious leader turned his guns on Miss Harman’s equality agenda, which many in the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church say could force them to hire homosexuals or transsexuals.

The Pope declared that some recent equality legislation has acted ‘to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs’.

He added: ‘In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed.’

By natural law, the Pope meant the Christian and Biblical teaching on which Roman Catholic beliefs are based, including the Ten Commandments. Rejection of the natural law is sinful in Catholic theology.

The speech was made to 35 Roman Catholic bishops from England and Wales visiting Rome. The Pope told them: ‘I urge you as pastors to ensure that the Church’s moral teaching be always presented in its entirety and convincingly defended.

‘Fidelity to the Gospel in no way restricts the freedom of others  –  on the contrary, it serves their freedom by offering them the truth.’

The powerful attack from Rome will deepen Miss Harman’s difficulties over her Bill.

The criticism, unexpected by ministers since it comes from abroad, follows last week’s emphatic rejection by the House of Lords of clauses Catholic churches feared would force them to hire actively homosexual priests and staff, or force Catholics to allow women to become priests.

Miss Harman’s Bill has already provoked deep opposition from the Church of England. Archbishop of York Dr John Sentamu said of it last week: ‘That way lies ruin.’

In his speech, the Pope said Britain was known for its ‘firm commitment’ to equality of opportunity for all.

But he said recent legislation had gone too far and was conflicting with the authentic freedoms of religious communities. He told the bishops ‘to insist upon your right to participate in national debate through respectful dialogue’.

Catholics arguing against Miss Harman’s Bill claimed it meant the Church could be sued by anyone turned away as a candidate for the priesthood on grounds of gender or sexual lifestyle. They would be powerless to stop priests from entering into civil partnerships, leading promiscuous lifestyles or having sex change operations.

The Government denied that the Bill would have had that effect but peers heeded the warning of the Catholic and Anglican bishops and deleted a controversial clause by 216 votes to 178.

When he visits the UK the Pope is expected to address MPs and peers on the issue of religious freedom from the spot in Westminster Hall where Sir Thomas More was condemned to death in 1535 for opposing the adultery of Henry VIII.

He is expected to preside over the beatification of the Victorian convert Cardinal John Henry Newman, possibly in Wembley Stadium, and will make a speech at Oxford University.

A spokesman for Miss Harman’s Government Equalities Office said yesterday: ‘The Equality Bill will make Britain a fairer and more equal place.’