Imprison Gays Says American Family Association Radio Host Bryan Fischer

Their own words show their Christo-Fascism


posted by: Tracy Viselli

Joe Jervis of Joe.My.God. writes about American Family Association radio host Bryan Fischer, who advocates putting “active homosexuals” through “an effective reparative therapy program” as we do with intravenous drug users because they are effectively committing the same crime, increasing the spread of HIV/AIDS.

Let’s be clear, Fischer is not advocating that ANY person, be they heterosexual or homosexual, who contracts HIV/AIDS through sexual contact, be forced into “reparative therapy.” Fischer reserves his judgment for gays only, making it clear where his prejudice lies. “Active homosexuals” are committing a crime by choosing to love or have sex with someone of the same gender.

Nothing says family values and the “redemptive love of Jesus Christ,” as Joe Jervis puts it,  like throwing people in prison because you don’t approve of the gender of their sex partners.

If there’s any justice in the after life Fischer believes in, Fischer will have to explain to his beloved christ why he spent so much time telling others to fear and to hate some of god’s children.

Vanderbilt Muslim Chaplain Says He Supports Executing Gays

The following is over on Queerty

Does believing that gays should be put to death qualify as a religious freedom? If you’re not actually murdering these people, we’d say yes. Believe whatever the hell you want to believe, crazy persons; that’s your right here in America. But it probably doesn’t make students at Vanderbilt University feel any better about Awadh A. Binhazim, the Kenyan-born University Muslim Chaplain, who just told students he supported this Islamic belief.

Posted in Hate Crimes, Human Rights, Religion, Social Justice. Comments Off on Vanderbilt Muslim Chaplain Says He Supports Executing Gays

Documents suggest Pope Pius XII more concerned about Soviets than Nazis

From the World Jewish Congress

02 February 2010

Two Italian researchers have found previously unknown correspondence about a meeting held in November 1944 between Pope Pius XII and the British ambassador to the Holy See, Francis D’Arcy Osborne. According to the papers, kept in the British National Archives in London, Osborne told the Catholic pontiff that the British government wanted him to issue a public appeal on behalf of the 400,000 Hungarian Jews who were being deported to the Nazi death camps at the time. However, Pius said that he was under pressure to condemn alleged abuses perpetrated by the Soviets against Catholic civilians in Poland and in the Baltic countries. Osborne reportedly told the pope that he had seen no evidence that the Russians had committed any such atrocities, and that even if they had, they could not be compared to the mass murder of Jews by the Nazis.

Continue reading at:

New Federal ‘Hate Crimes’ Law Challenged on Constitutional Grounds

[ As I have come to note “Family Values” is Christo-Fascist form of newspeak for Nazi values of hate and bigotry.

People need be aware that religion taken as a whole has never supported human rights or equality and that they constantly lie saying they have.

Never mind the fact that Christianity and Islam have brought some 2000 years of heinous religious wars. Lets take the last 500 years:

They supported the murder of “witches” with some respected historians saying the numbers murdered were in the millions.

They supported European imperialism in the Western Hemisphere that resulted in the genocide of millions of Native Peoples.

They supported the colonization of Africa and Asia.

They supported the slave trade, slavery and opposed the abolition of slavery in the US.

They opposed women’s suffrage, the Equal Rights Amendment and feminism.

Pope Pius XII supported Hitler,  Mussolini and Franco.

The same Christo-Fascists opposed to LGBT/T rights also opposed civil rights for African Americans and women’s rights, including but not limited to reproductive rights.


Tuesday, February 02, 2010
By Susan Jones, Senior Editor

( – A conservative civil liberties group is challenging the constitutionality of the recently enacted federal Hate Crimes Prevention Act of 2009.

The new law, attached to a defense authorization bill that President Obama signed on October 28, 2009, makes it a federal crime to attack someone because of their sexual orientation or gender identity. The Michigan-based Thomas More Law Center says it elevates people engaged in deviant sexual behaviors to a special, protected class of persons under federal law.

The lawsuit naming U.S. Attorney General Eric Holder was filed in U.S. District Court for the Eastern District of Michigan on behalf of three pastors and the president of the American Family Association of Michigan.

All of the plaintiffs “take a strong public stand against the homosexual agenda, which seeks to normalize disordered sexual behavior that is contrary to Biblical teaching,” the Law Center said in a news release.

“There is no legitimate law enforcement need for this federal law,’ said Richard Thompson, president and chief counsel of the Thomas More Law Center.

“This is part of the list of political payoffs to homosexual advocacy groups for support of Barack Obama in the last presidential election,” Thompson continued. “The sole purpose of this law is to criminalize the Bible and use the threat of federal prosecutions and long jail sentences to silence Christians from expressing their Biblically-based religious belief that homosexual conduct is a sin.  It elevates those persons who engage in deviant sexual behaviors, including pedophiles, to a special protected class of persons as a matter of federal law and policy.”

According to the Law Center, of the 1.38 million violent crimes in the U.S. reported by the FBI in 2008, only 243 were considered to be motivated by the victim’s sexual orientation.

The four plaintiffs are Michiagn Pastors Levon Yuille, Rene Ouellette, James Combs, and Gary Glenn, president of the American Family Association of Michigan.

The lawsuit alleges that the new law violates the plaintiffs’ rights to freedom of speech, expressive association, and free exercise of religion protected by the First Amendment, and it violates the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amendment.  The lawsuit also alleges that Congress lacked authority to enact the legislation under the Tenth Amendment and the Commerce Clause of the United States Constitution.

The lawsuit says the Hate Crimes Prevention Act “provides law enforcement with authorization and justification to conduct federal investigative and other federal law enforcement actions against Plaintiffs and others deemed to be opponents of homosexual activism, the homosexual lifestyle, and the homosexual agenda,” thereby expanding the jurisdiction of the FBI and other federal law enforcement and intelligence gathering agencies.

Robert Muise,  who is handling the case, said the new law promotes two Orwellian concepts: “It creates a special class of persons who are ‘more equal than others’ based on nothing more than deviant, sexual behavior.  And it creates ‘thought crimes’ by criminalizing certain ideas, beliefs, and opinions, and the involvement of such ideas, beliefs, and opinions in a crime will make it deserving of federal prosecution.”

He said it gives government officials the power “to decide which thoughts are criminal under federal law and which are not.”

The Thomas More Law Center describes its mission as defending and promoting “America’s Christian heritage and moral values, including the religious freedom of Christians, time-honored family values, and the sanctity of human life.”

Posted in Christo-Fascism, Hate Crimes, History, Religion, Social Justice, Uncategorized, Unequal Treatment. Comments Off on New Federal ‘Hate Crimes’ Law Challenged on Constitutional Grounds

Countering the Grunts (The Ten Lies and how to expose them )

By Sophia

02/02/2010 at 8:26am

There follows a typical list of statements used mainly against three minority groups in the media on the comments sections of articles.
These three groups are Transgender people, Transsexual people and Intersex people, All three are fundamentally different but the grunts in the media like to class them all as the same, for reasons which will become evident.

1: “Surgery does not make a man or a woman!”

The problem with this statement is quite simple, the grunts are not being entirely truthful. When they say this (Often to transsexual people) the grunts are very keen not to mention the grunts pay taxes, quite happily to carry out very similar procedures on intersex children, who neither consent to such surgery or ask for it.

2: “Why should we pay taxes to feed a delusion.”

Again the grunts usually aim this at transsexual people (Their favorite target) and talk of “surgery being used to feed a delusion” Again who’s delusion is being fed when intersex children are surgically mutilated? Who’s delusion is it when on the strength of that non consented to surgery birth documentation is fully amended to fit? Not partially by some gender recognition process, but in entirety. What is every birth certificate reading absolutely “Male” or “Female” if it is not a delusion?

3: “Men are XY and Women are XX.”

This is perhaps the most blatant lie of them all, sex is determined by DNA not the packaging (Chromosomes). If the DNA is not able to produce a male or female phenotype, regardless of the packaging then that is that. It is like describing a library on the way one bookshelf looks.

4: “G-d does not make mistakes”

So G-d makes people endure these hellish situations on purpose then? For what reason? So the grunts have got a bone to chew on?

5: “People are the product of their upbringing, those raised as girls are women those raised as boys are men.”

David Reimer and a lot of intersex people would not agree. The problem I have with the mainly “Liberal” media spouting this line of reasoning (Social fatalism) is that this model was actually tested by Dr John Money during the 1960’s and 1970’s and it failed. With horrific results.

6: “We need to deconstruct the gender binary and then all these minority groups will just go away.”

Being born with ambiguous genitalia won’t go away, nor will things that affect the other groups. And if in getting rid of the “Gender binary” you are strict about the two sex system, you will never get rid of the gender binary.

7: “This is political correctness gone mad!”

That one only gets wheeled out when it is convenient. When it comes to “Religious tolerance” the statement: “It is our human right to exclude, punish, torment and hammer those we hate as an act of religious duty!” is what exactly? Political correctness gone mad of course.

8: “Parents of transgender children who let them have their way are abusing their children!”

This is of course literally what it says, when mutilating intersex children it is to make it clear that the child must never have what they want, (See argument 1) The only real child abusers are those who would rid their child of autonomy and free will in order to impose some sex status (That is that sort of abuse is it not?)

9: “G-d created Adam and Eve and did so for his purposes”

Resorting to “I am an atheist” tends not to work, the answer to this one is simple If G-d is the G-d of both Adam and Eve and both were made in
G-d’s image, then G-d is what exactly? Certainly not just “He” (Genesis 1:27 read properly)

10: “It is not natural!”

Nor is imposing a false ideal of what a man or a woman is when it is plainly obvious by now that in nature, sex dimorphism is not as clear cut as it is claimed to be.

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off on Countering the Grunts (The Ten Lies and how to expose them )

Pope condemns Harman equality drive as ‘violation of natural law’

Red Prada Pump Wearing Former Hitler Youth Turned Pope sees equality as threat to his using superstition to maintain his power

Isn’t it just precious?  Pope Adolf doesn’t believe in equality.  Diderot was right.   Humankind will only be free when the last oligarch is strangled with the guts of the last priest. (paraphrase)

A man who heads a major man-boy love pedophile conspiracy has the nerve to preach inequality.

Tax the bloody churches like the businesses they are.

From the Daily Mail

Simon Caldwell
Last updated at 6:51 AM on 02nd February 2010

Pope Benedict XVI: Visiting Britain in September

The Pope yesterday made an unprecedented attack on Britain’s equality legislation, claiming Harriet Harman’s attempts to bring in new laws enforced sinful behaviour.

Benedict XVl condemned Labour’s Equality Bill in extraordinary terms as an assault on the ‘natural law’ of Christianity  –  in other words a sin.

His remarks came in a speech at the Vatican moments after he confirmed he will visit the UK in September.

Despite praising Britain’s ‘firm commitment to equality of opportunity for all members of society’, the world’s most powerful religious leader turned his guns on Miss Harman’s equality agenda, which many in the hierarchy of the Roman Catholic Church say could force them to hire homosexuals or transsexuals.

The Pope declared that some recent equality legislation has acted ‘to impose unjust limitations on the freedom of religious communities to act in accordance with their beliefs’.

He added: ‘In some respects it actually violates the natural law upon which the equality of all human beings is grounded and by which it is guaranteed.’

By natural law, the Pope meant the Christian and Biblical teaching on which Roman Catholic beliefs are based, including the Ten Commandments. Rejection of the natural law is sinful in Catholic theology.

The speech was made to 35 Roman Catholic bishops from England and Wales visiting Rome. The Pope told them: ‘I urge you as pastors to ensure that the Church’s moral teaching be always presented in its entirety and convincingly defended.

‘Fidelity to the Gospel in no way restricts the freedom of others  –  on the contrary, it serves their freedom by offering them the truth.’

Harriet Harman: Equality agenda

The powerful attack from Rome will deepen Miss Harman’s difficulties over her Bill.

The criticism, unexpected by ministers since it comes from abroad, follows last week’s emphatic rejection by the House of Lords of clauses Catholic churches feared would force them to hire actively homosexual priests and staff, or force Catholics to allow women to become priests.

Miss Harman’s Bill has already provoked deep opposition from the Church of England. Archbishop of York Dr John Sentamu said of it last week: ‘That way lies ruin.’

In his speech, the Pope said Britain was known for its ‘firm commitment’ to equality of opportunity for all.

But he said recent legislation had gone too far and was conflicting with the authentic freedoms of religious communities. He told the bishops ‘to insist upon your right to participate in national debate through respectful dialogue’.

Catholics arguing against Miss Harman’s Bill claimed it meant the Church could be sued by anyone turned away as a candidate for the priesthood on grounds of gender or sexual lifestyle. They would be powerless to stop priests from entering into civil partnerships, leading promiscuous lifestyles or having sex change operations.

The Government denied that the Bill would have had that effect but peers heeded the warning of the Catholic and Anglican bishops and deleted a controversial clause by 216 votes to 178.

When he visits the UK the Pope is expected to address MPs and peers on the issue of religious freedom from the spot in Westminster Hall where Sir Thomas More was condemned to death in 1535 for opposing the adultery of Henry VIII.

He is expected to preside over the beatification of the Victorian convert Cardinal John Henry Newman, possibly in Wembley Stadium, and will make a speech at Oxford University.

A spokesman for Miss Harman’s Government Equalities Office said yesterday: ‘The Equality Bill will make Britain a fairer and more equal place.’