Catholic Church as Anti-Trans Hate Group: The Smoking Gun

Lately the Christo-Fascists have been whining how Hate Crimes laws are anti religious.

Well folks the churches of today are not those of Martin Luther King nor are they preaching liberation theology. The Catholic Church has a rather sketchy history filled with misogyny, witch burnings- Antisemitism, racism and genocide. It has an 1800 year history of being used as a tool by the rulers to keep the poor oppressed.

Shoot even after Hitler’s death Camps and the murder of six million Jews was revealed Catholics still called Jews “Christ Killers”

Hatred and bigotry are the core beliefs of the Catholic Church. Transsexuals and Transgenders have become but the latest “Whipping Girls

Of course one has to notice how this misogynistic bigot only attacks T to F people.  This is right in line with the near homoerotic addulation of the male that is at the core of the Catholic Church of pedophilia.

The closet and denial and raping children.

These dicks fear that hate crimes laws will deter their bigotry.

Perhaps they belong in the same category as the KKK and Aryan Nation.

They sure sound like it.

Further Andrea Brown, Lynn Conway, Andrea James and others have been tracking the roots of all the psychopathologizing of T to F transsexuals and ransgenders and the most interesting common thread has been the roots in the Catholic Hate Group.

Now I was cured of the curse of ignorance and superstition when a priest patted my knee and in an unctuous manner suggested that rather than grow up to live in mortal sin where even committing the thought crime of thinking about my being born transsexual was as much a sin as acting on it but that I could save myself by entering the priesthood and praying to overcome those feelings.  Ah the Epicurean delemma. Or a version of it anyhow.  I had prayed to either change physically or for the feelings to go away.  The prayers were unanswered.

God was either powerless or malicious.  Or did not exist

The question this posed was the anarchist one of, “Why?”  The answer was. “There is no god. Religion is a tool of patriarchal oppression.

They do not rant about T to M people because wanting to become male reinforces the ideology of male supremacy.

Pass the hate crimes laws.  If hate and bigotry are such core tenets of the Catholic Church then perhaps it is time to give the victims of faith based hate the tools to fight back through laws and lawsuits.

Suzan

Catholic Exchange, USA

Legalizing Deception: Why “Gender Identity” Should Not be Added to Anti-discrimination Legislation

June 25th, 2009 by Dale O’Leary

Certain national and international groups are pushing for the addition of “gender identity” and “gender expression” to anti-discrimination laws. According to activists, gender identity is defined as: “An individual’s self–perception or inner sense of being a man, a male, a woman, a female, both, neither, butch, femme, two-spirit, bigender, or another configuration of gender. Gender identity often matches the gender typically associated with the person’s anatomy but sometimes does not” and gender expression refers to: “Any combination of how someone outwardly presents external characteristics behaviors that are socially defined as masculine or feminine, including dress, mannerisms speech patterns and social interactions.”[1]

For example, a bill introduced in the Maryland legislature reads as follows: “An owner or operator of a place of public accommodation …may not refuse, withhold from, or deny to any person any of the accommodations, advantages, facilities, or privileges of the place of public accommodation because of the person’s … gender identity.” This would mean that males dressed as females could use women’s restrooms and locker rooms.

Such legislation is designed to give legal protections to those who reject the sex they were born with and want to be publicly accepted as the other sex -– the so-called ‘transsexuals,’ ‘transgendered,’ ‘gender queer,’ transvestites, and others. Such persons deceive themselves, deceive others, and are being deceived by mental health professionals and surgeons. The public is being deceived by the media and activists into believing that so-called ‘transsexuals’ were born with biological problems that are remedied by surgery and that it is possible to change your sex.

No one can change sex; it is written in DNA on every cell of our bodies. The people demanding “gender identity and expression” protection are physically normal men or women, but according to the “gender” ideologues, what matters is not what sex you really are, but what sex you want to be or think you are. People could be sanctioned
for simply using the correct pronouns when referring to a person who is obviously male, but wants to be female.

The following quote from an interview with Dr. Theodore Dalrymple, author of a collection of essays titled: Our Culture, What’s Left of It: The Mandarins and the Masses demonstrates the effect such lies have on the culture:

In my study of communist societies, I came to the conclusion that the purpose of communist propaganda was not to persuade or convince, nor to inform, but to humiliate; and therefore, the less it corresponded to reality the better. When people are forced to remain silent when they are being told the most obvious lies, or even worse when they are forced to repeat the lies themselves, they lose once and for all their sense of probity. To assent to obvious lies is to co-operate with evil, and in some small way to become evil oneself. One’s standing to resist anything is thus eroded, and even destroyed.[2]

One lie leads to another. A clearly male person presents himself in public as a woman. He has had surgery and hormone treatments to perfect his impersonation and he demands that we pretend this makes him a woman. He wants us to use female pronouns when speaking of him and to allow him to use the ladies’ restroom. He also wants to change his birth certificate and driver’s license. While some persons who present as the other sex are obviously not the sex they pretend to be, others are able to deceive their sexual partners without informing them of their true sexual identity.

Persons who present themselves in public as the other sex say they need such protections because they are afraid of violence. This fear is real. When someone is deceived — particularly in such a personal matter has the sex of an intimate partner or potential spouse — anger is an understandable reaction. Violent acts can never be condoned, but if such legislation is passed those who have been deceived will be denied any legal recourse and the deceivers will be portrayed as victims.

The circle of deception created by this “gender ideology” begins with those who want to be the other sex deceiving themselves. As children they may have been wounded, traumatized, abused, or rejected. They fell into envy and fantasy, imagining “If I were the other sex, I would be safe, loved, valued.” This envy grew into an obsession. They coveted the body parts of the other sex, and despised their own bodies. The idea that they were “transsexual” may have been suggested
to them by a mental health professional or they may have seen reports of “sex changes” in the media. They deceived themselves into believing that this would be the answer to all their problems. While some may simply want to be the other sex, others may actually come to believe that they really are the other sex, that nature made a mistake and gave them the body of one sex and the brain of the other. Such a delusion is very difficult to treat, particularly when the person learns that there are surgeons able to fulfill their fantasy and create the appearance of the other sex.

While those applying for surgery may insist that they have the brain or soul of the other sex, they really don’t know what it means to be the other sex. Most can only present a very stereotyped image of their desired sex. They have to constantly monitor their own gestures and mannerisms. They are excited when they are able to deceive others — to pass — but admit that they are often not accepted as the other sex. They want the government to force people to go along with their
deception, but even if such laws are passed they will only be able to fool some of the people some of the time.

While persons who want to be the other sex desperately want to believe that they were born with this problem, there is no evidence for this. Some men and women who want to be the other sex failed to identify with their birth sex as children. This condition, known as childhood gender (sexual) identity disorder (G[S]ID), is preventable and treatable. Even without treatment most children with G[S]ID grow out of it; however, a small number persist in their desire to be the other sex.

Not all persons who want to be the other sex suffered from obvious symptoms of G[S]ID as children. Some males are autogynephiles, who began in adolescence to engage in paraphilic transvestite fetishism. A paraphilia is a sexual attraction to something other than another person. In this case a man is sexually aroused by to the image of himself as a woman. As unhappy adolescents, these males engaged in masturbation wearing their mother’s clothing and fantasized about being women. Many autogynephiles marry, have children, and engage in male-typical careers, while secretly engaging in cross-dressing. For some autogynephiles, cross-dressing is not enough; they want to perfect this image through surgery. One autogynephile explained that these are men who want to become what they love.[3] After surgery many
autogynephiles continue to be sexually attracted to women and insist they are lesbians. It is interesting to note that some radical feminists are offended by the stereotyped images of women these men present. Some feminist groups have restricted their gatherings to women born as women and living as women.

Those who are obsessed with the idea of being the other sex often resist therapy. They refuse to look at the psychological reasons for their desires. Some mental health professionals, frustrated by their inability to treat this disorder and concerned about their clients’ obvious dysphoria, are willing to go along with this deception. They
give in to their clients’ demands and recommend a surgical solution to what they as therapists know is a mental health problem. They deceive their clients into believing that a “sex change” is possible.

The “sex change” surgeons know they can’t change a persons’ sex, they can only create a non-functional appearance of the other sex, but they also know they will be well paid for their skill and so go along with the deception.

The news media report glowing tales of how John became Jane and is now entirely happy. Reporters use the new names and incorrect pronouns. Headlines read “The Pregnant Man” when the reality is that a woman who had her breasts removed and received male hormones to induce beard growth became pregnant by artificial insemination. Doubters are labeled “transphobic.”

Public officials go along with the deception, allowing persons who want to be the other sex to falsify their driver licenses and other documents, even some who have not been surgically altered.

Those who go through mutilating surgery — who sacrificed so much to achieve their fantasy — have to continue the deception even though their unrealistic expectations are often not met.[4] Anne Lawrence, a post surgery autogynephile, explains how the fantasy breaks down:

Autogynephilic transsexuals may also find it harder to fully identify with women after transition than before, because the difference they inevitably observe between themselves and natal women become harder to rationalize after transition. Before transition, these differences can be attributed to the necessity of temporarily maintaining a socially acceptable masculine persona: after transition, when this excuse evaporates, autogynephilic transsexuals may be forced to confront
reality. Nonhomosexual MtF transsexuals often seem to expect that, with enough effort, they will be able to pass undetected as natal women after transition; but because their appearance and behavior are rarely naturally feminine, this expectation usually proves unrealistic.[5]

Lawrence also points out that when autogynephiles are not accepted as the sex they want to be they can be vulnerable to narcissistic rage, which is defined as the “disproportionate, compulsive pursuit of revenge that seeks to obliterate both the offense and the offender.”[6] Extending legal protection to persons who want to
present themselves as the other sex will give these narcissistic autogynephiles the right to pursue legal sanctions against those who will not go long with the lie that they have changed their sex. Given that “transsexuals” suffer from a “fundamental disorder” in their sense of self and are prone to narcissistic rage[7], there is every
reason to believe that they will use such laws to ruthlessly attack anyone who speaks the truth.

If you want to understand the full potential of such wrath, consider the case of John Michael Bailey, whose book The Man who would be Queen provoked retaliation from a small group of persons who didn’t like being labeled autogynephiles. They used the Internet to make outrageous accusations against Bailey, attacking his children, trying to turn colleagues against him, and to have him fired from his job.[8]

Lawrence applies the following clinical description of narcissistic rage to Bailey’s opponents:

…need for revenge, for righting a wrong, for undoing a hurt by whatever means, and deeply anchored, unrelenting compulsion in the pursuit of all these aims… There is utter disregard for reasonable limitations and a boundless wish to redress an injury and to obtain revenge… The fanaticism of the need for revenge and the unending
compulsion of having to square the account after an offense…The narcissistically injured… cannot rest until he has blotted out [the]… offender who dared to oppose him, to disagree with him.

Even if only a small number of autogynephiles are prone to narcissistic revenge, they could cause incredible harm to anyone who speaks the truth. They would see injury everywhere, file complaints, and institute lawsuits.

The laws adding “gender identity” to anti-discrimination legislation would allow men and women with serious psychological disorders, some of whom are prone to narcissistic rage and revenge to use the law to persecute business owners who are attempting to protect the privacy of customers in restrooms and locker rooms.

If “gender identity” is added to anti-discrimination legislation, the lie of “sex change” will be taught in the schools. It won’t be long before we will have children’s books about how Johnny’s daddy is now Johnny’s mommy and everyone is living happily ever after. Teachers and other school personnel will expect to be accepted in whatever form they appear. Mr. Brown will come back after summer vacation as Miss Brown.

Confused children with G[S]ID who need treatment are already being pushed down the path to surgical mutilation. Schools are being told that if an elementary school boy or girl believes that he or she is the other sex everyone should go along with this fantasy. The school should allow these troubled children to change their names, dress as the other sex, and use the restrooms of the other sex. Other children will be punished if they object or speak the truth.

And it gets worse. In some places, at age 11 these children who think they are the other sex are given puberty-blocking hormones so that secondary sexual characteristics do not appear. Then they are given hormones proper to the other sex, so that at age 18 they can be surgically mutilated. In other words, the entire educational, psychological, and medical establishment is conspiring to see that these children never receive proper treatment. There is no research on
the long-term effects of these hormone treatments on developing the bodies and brain. Do we really believe that 11-year-old children have the judgment necessary to decide to permanently surrender their sexual identity and reproductive potential?

It seems like such a small change –- just add “gender identity” to anti-discrimination laws, but such a change discriminates against the truth and endangers children. We have an obligation to oppose it with all our energy.

One way is to stop using their language. Their words distort and deceive. I am currently working on Lexicon for the profamily movement. We need a common vocabulary so that we can speak the truth about the human person.

If you are interested in participating in the development of such a Lexicon or would like to view my suggestions, email me at and request the paper “Don’t Say Gender When You
Mean Sex.”

[1]GLSEN Jump Start Guide, “Gender-Related Terminology List.”
[www.glsen.org/binary-data/GLSEN_ATTACHMENTS/file/000/000/966-1.pdf].

[2] Jamie Glazov (2005) “Our Culture, What’s Left of It,” Frontpage
Magazine, August 3.

[3] Anne Lawrence, (2007) “Becoming what we love: Autogynephilic
transsexualism conceptualized as an expression of romantic love,”
Perspectives in Biology and Medicine, 50, 506-520.

[4] J. Michael Bailey (2003) The Man who would be Queen: The Science
of Gender-Bending and Transsexualism, Washington, DC: John Henry
Press.

[5] Anne Lawrence (2008) “Shame and Narcissistic Rage in
Autogynephilic Transsexualism,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37:
457-461.

[6] H. Kohut (1971) The analysis of self: A systematic approach to the
psychoanalytic treatment of narcissistic personality disorders, (NY:
International Universities Press; H. Kohut (1972) “Thoughts on
narcissism and narcissistic age,” Psychoanalytic Study of the Child,
27:360-400.

[7] Lawrence, Ibid. A, Beitel (1985) “The spectrum of gender identity
disturbances: An intrapsyhic model,” in B. W. Steiner, (ed) Gender
Dysphoria: Development, Research, Management (NY: Pleum) pp. 189-206;
U. Hartman et al (1997) “Self and gender: Narcissistic pathology and
personality factors in gender dysphoric patients: Preliminary results
of a prospective study,” International Journal of Transgenderism,
http://www.symposion.com/ijt/ijtcf0103.htm.

[8] Alice Dreger (2008) “The controversy surrounding The Man Who Would
Be Queen A case history of the politics of Science, Identity, and Sex
in the Internet Age,” Archives of Sexual Behavior, 37: 366-421.


Dale O’Leary, internationally known lecturer and author of The Gender
Agenda, One Man, One Woman and numerous articles, currently resides in
Florida.

Copyright © 2009 Catholic Exchange.

http://catholicexchange.com/2009/06/25/119728/

8 Responses to “Catholic Church as Anti-Trans Hate Group: The Smoking Gun”

  1. catkisser Says:

    This “issue” with the catholic church goes back as far as the second century. The writings attributed (falsely) to Saul of Tarsus (Paul) that address women are aimed at the priestesses of Cybele specifically as reading the lesser known 2’nd century christian apologists make clear.

    Additionally, Augustine had a relationship with a gallae (transsexual) priestess of Cybele which is alluded to in his “Confessions”. After his conversion he railed that the transsexual priestesses of Cybele were “castrated perverts”.

    When today’s alleged transsexuals question the value of the scientific studies showing the neurological intersexed nature of classic transsexuality they should refer to the article you printed here. The Church has a long history of being on the wrong side of science, this is another case. Some day in the near future all this psycho-babble and confusion of AGs with transsexuals will clearly be seen for what it is, crap that flies in the face of the facts. This is precisely why those studies are important. There are over 230 of them now. The evidence is in and the facts are clear. Transsexuality is a birth condition not a psychological one.

  2. JoAnna Michaels Says:

    The catholic church as manifested in the cardinals, bishops and stepford followers is an evil institution designed by man to supress and control the population of women and minorities.
    everything that threatens the hierarchies control becomes a sin, So you dare not question them as it will be a sin punishable by getting a mortal sin that will condemn you to hell
    Jesus represents love and peace why isn;t that practiced instead of the fear and hate that really occurs
    No thanks
    God and i have a terrific relationship and she helps me through my days as i look for spiritual guidance
    Love and peace
    JoAnna

  3. The catholic church comes out against transsexual and transgender rights. « Women Born Transsexual Says:

    […] of the opinion of the catholic church on transsexualism https://womenborntranssexual.com/2009/06/26/catholic-church-as-anti-trans-hate-group-the-smoking-gun/ Possibly related posts: (automatically generated)Gender-bending: the original spirit of PridePost […]

  4. Rev, Wena Dian Parry Says:

    Thank for your writing.
    I have finished and autobiography of my pre-transition period. I am now writing a self analiese of my thoughts on being TS and a Christian, some of your work will help greatly. I am further looking at the [“Discuss”] Trans community hoaxes: 20 clues and how to avoid getting scammed; an article by from one of the members of discuss.

    Thank you again.

    Dian

  5. Just a TGurl Wannabe Says:

    The Catholic church, like all religions, is imperfect. Only God is perfect.
    This is an example of the church being imperfect. I do wish that the church would take the time to talk with and survey its many members who are transgenders. Given time, I am sure that they would reverse their thinking.
    Jesus ministered to those in need. Is there any needier group of people (for love and acceptance) than transgenders?
    I hope and pray the church will see the Light on this one!

    • Suzan Says:

      There is no god.

      Ignorant people created gods before they had science or understanding of how the universe worked to explain phenomena they could not understand.

      Lazy men created religions to scam others into supporting them so they diod not have to work.

      Religion exists to maintain the control men have over women as well as to oppress minorities.

      Outside of maintaining the patriachy its main function is to prevent the poor from rising up and killing their oppressors.

  6. Alisoncc Says:

    Many years ago a good friend used to end all her emails with a simple prayer “Dear God, please protect me from all your representatives on earth”. Enough said.

    Hugs Alison

  7. Joann Prinzivalli Says:

    Thank you for reposting this horror. It represents the extremist end of Roman Catholic thinking on the subject. Sadly, it is a position that is incompatible with the teachings of Jesus Christ, which is the way it is with the immoral “moral theology” emanating from the bowels of the Congregation for the Doctrine of the Faith, the Curial body (formerly known as The Holy Office or The Inquisition), as it relates to the treatment of women or the treatment of gays and lesbians.

    The tetragrammaton “YHWH” is a simple puzzle, and it relates to Genesis 1:27 (how we are all created in the “image and likeness of God, male *and* female.”

    Quite simply, God is one of us: Read YHWH backward, and the secret identity pops out – HW HY – which comes out in English as HE/SHE. The Name of God is He-She! The very insult that is often hurled at those who may not “pass” very well, is actually calling that person God-like.

    Needless to say, the extremist Roman Catholic Church position focuses on Genesis 1:27 to indicate that there are men, and there are women, and anyone who doesn’t fit into the “either” or the “or” in accordance with birth genitals is mentally ill.

    They ignore the kerygma contained in Isaiah 56, Matthew 19:12 and Acts 8. They ignore the fact that those of us who are *different* from that cookie-cutter birth-genital-based “male=penis-at-birth*or* female=vagina-at-birth” are known by God (according to isaiah 56) to be so special, that if we follow God’s laws (not the apostate Roman Catholic Church’s), there is a special place for us in God’s house that is better than children (and perhaps even better than chocolate).

    Jesus recognizes that some people are *different* – some are eunuchs from birth, some are made eunuchs by men, and some make themselves eunuchs for the sake of the kingdom of heaven. To be *different* in the way that all trans* people are different, is a mark that we are *special* in the sight of God.

    Just to make it clear, in addition to the Book of Isaiah and the very words of Jesus Christ, we have an explicit tie-in with the story of Philip and the Ethiopian eunuch in Acts 8 – the eunuch was reading Isaiah, and was clearly at Chapter 53 already – in the ensuing discussion the two of them managed to get to Chapter 56, at which point the eunuch asked for baptism, and Philip agreed.

    But the apostate Catholic Church of today considers us to be mentally-ill perverts in need of harmful reparative therapy. Of course, as catkisser points out, this is something that occurred fairly early in Church history, in part because Christianity sought to suppress the competition.

    After all, ritualized cannibalism as a sacrament doesn’t necessarily compete well with either sex as a sacrament, or inebriation as a state of holiness (or what seems to be both, from Romans 1). So the Bacchic, Cybelline and Eleusinian mysteries, the worship of the Sun rather than the Son, and all the other religious beliefs tolerated under more enlightened rulers had to be suppressed.

    Add to that the intolerance of those who hate and fear people who are different, and it is a recipe for disaster.

    The only think I do know, is that God will judge those who treat us the way they do – and they will be numbered among the goats on the day of Judgment – when they will finally realize that their oppression of our people, who are among the least of God’s people (at least in number), is the same as oppressing God. (Mt 25)

    Of course, the more rational among us might point out that it’s all superstition after all. But when one is treating the particularly virulent Christianist mental illness of apostate Roman Catholicism, I think it is necessary to provide these people with some reasoning within their frame of reference – and what would be better as a frame of reference than to use their own delusions to help explain how wrong they are?


Comments are closed.

%d bloggers like this: