Friday Night Fun and Culture: Johnny Otis and Etta James

This week two giants in Rhythm and Blues passed away Johnny Otis and Etta James.

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

George Carlin – Why You Are In Debt

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Shit (Young, White, Class-privileged, City-based) “Radical Queers” Say to Each Other

Should trans screen roles be played by trans actors?

From The Guardian UK: http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/14/trans-characters-actors

Transsexual characters promote positive discussion, regardless of who plays them. But trans actors need more opportunities

guardian.co.uk, Saturday 14 January 2012

“He’s playing a transsexual,” said Ben Stephenson, controller of drama commissioning, as the BBC announced that Sean Bean would star as Simon, an English teacher with an “alter ego” named Tracie in legal drama Accused. “[It's] a brilliant story,” Stephenson told the Broadcasting Press Guild, “untold, I think, on mainstream television.” Bean’s appearance is the latest to raise an issue constantly debated within certain circles: should trans roles on screen be played by trans people?

Critiquing stereotypical portrayals in Whipping Girl, Julia Serano stated that “in a world where transsexual and intersex works of art … are not considered mainstream enough to be nominated for Emmys and Pulitzers, the facade presented in [HBO drama] Normal … profoundly shapes audience opinions about transsexual and intersex people”. The problem, argued Serano, was that Normal appropriated gender-variant experiences without including transgender perspectives, replacing them with the director’s unchallenged prejudices, which, intentionally or not, felt deeply transphobic.

From this position, it’s easy to think cisgender (non-trans) actors taking trans roles entirely negative, but well written and researched, it can have benefits. Two British soap operas featured regular transsexual characters: Coronation Street’s Hayley and Hollyoaks’ Jason, played by Julie Hesmondhalgh and Victoria Atkin, both of whom worked with trans people to iron out cliches and earned praise for their sensitive performances, raised positive media discussions about transsexualism and became vocal trans rights advocates.

Obviously actors make their names by convincingly playing people of different backgrounds. The best depictions helped me as a closeted teen: none of Priscilla, Queen of the Desert‘s leads identified as transgender, but its smart, pithy avoidance of psychopaths or victim characters in favour of people intelligently handling trans-specific and other challenges gave hope that transsexual life was liveable – even if its cast offered no role models, which were also desperately needed, and which the film was better placed than most to provide.

Continue reading at:  http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2012/jan/14/trans-characters-actors

Bullying Claims Another Victim… an Unexpected One

From Huffington Post:  http://www.huffingtonpost.com/marlo-thomas/bullying-claims-another-v_b_1214436.html


Posted: 1/19/12

Hi Marlo – Our son Kameron was bullied relentlessly and committed suicide on January 18th. He was 14 years old. In lieu of flowers we asked for donations be made to St Jude’s, my mom’s favorite for decades. I know you’re busy, but just wondering of you could take a look at our son. We have nothing else to lose. ~ Thanks

This heartbreaking note posted on my Facebook page started my kinship with an extraordinary man. He lived every parent’s silent dread — looking back on the senseless death of an innocent child asking “How?” and “Why?” and “What could have been done?” Kevin Jacobsen’s son saw no alternative but to take his own life rather than face another day of relentless bullying.

Kevin inspired those around him. He inspired me. When he spoke to a crowded room at the U.S. Department of Education at a bullying conference last fall, he roused them to a standing ovation. He hid his pain behind action. His notes to me about anti-bullying legislation were carefully considered. He served as a bridge to other families. He decided that no family should suffer as his did.

Then came even more devastating news — on January 7, Kevin, the father who had suffered and learned; the inspired leader of other families — took his own life, too. I can’t begin to say I have insight into this second act of sadness. Just that I was hit by an unrelenting wave of shock. I pray for Wanda and her family to find strength.

My resolve now is even stronger. I will not stand by and see other families destroyed. We must defeat this issue. Parents, teachers, grandparents, and — most of all — kids, must band together and stop this epidemic in our schools and on our playgrounds. No child should ever be made to feel such desperation. No parent should have to lose a child this way. No wife should lose a husband and son. Join with me now. Our children deserve better. The Jacobsen family — you are not alone. We will not stop until bullying recedes into the past and becomes nothing more than a sad chapter of inhumanity and a reminder that we must all stand together.

To support the Jacobsen family during this difficult time, visit http://www.wandajacobsendonationfund.com

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Boy or Girl? Why Dads Want Sons, but Moms Want Daughters

From Time Magazine: http://healthland.time.com/2012/01/19/boy-or-girl-why-dads-want-sons-but-moms-want-daughters/?iid=hl-article-latest

Women strongly prefer daughters while men wants sons, a study finds. Could this lead to sex selection?

By Bonnie Rochman
January 19, 2012

That tired truism about wanting only a healthy baby and not caring about gender? Puh-leeze. Women want daughters, and men crave sons, finds research in the journal Open Anthropology.

The results surprised even the researchers, from Queen’s University in Ontario, Canada, who’d surveyed more than 2,000 students, staff and faculty at the college about gender preference in offspring. They’d assumed that respondents would show little or no preference, but they found that — no matter how they worded the question — there was a “significant offspring gender preference” along gender lines.

Respondents answered the following questions:

  1. What gender would you prefer your firstborn child to be (or did you hope for if you already have a child)?
  2.  If you were to have (or do have) more than one child, would you prefer the majority to be male or female?
  3. If you were to have only one child, what gender would you prefer it to be?

“Today, offspring gender preference conflicts with the ongoing mission in many nations, especially in Western Europe and North America, to pursue social and political agendas aimed at eliminating all discrimination on the basis of gender,” write the authors.

And yet, it persists. What gives?

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

The End of the Christian Right

From The New Republic:   http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/99679/whose-afraid-the-christian-right-the-precipitous-political-decline-conservati

Michael Kazin
January 17, 2012

Is the Christian Right still a power in American politics? The lavish coverage which its partisans and their favorite issues have received during the current Republican campaign certainly leave that impression. Yet all this attention is akin to the dazzling glow of a setting sun. In fact, the Christian Right is a fading force in American life, one which has little chance of achieving its cherished goals.

Yes, pious conservatives earned the underfunded Rick Santorum a virtual tie in the Iowa caucuses, and, last week, a large gathering of evangelical leaders nodded fervently in his direction. Every GOP candidate still in the race speaks of Planned Parenthood as if it were a band of terrorists and vows to stop the largest and oldest reproductive rights group in the country from winning even a dollar of federal funding—and all of them except Ron Paul has signed a firm pledge to support a constitutional amendment that would essentially ban same-sex marriage. As for the presumptive nominee Mitt Romney, who has earned the suspicions of many conservative evangelicals, he has worked tirelessly to ingratiate himself with the Christian Right. Pro-Romney robo-calls in South Carolina currently feature a right-to-lifer from Massachusetts who opens her pitch, “I know you have heard a lot of folks talking about Mitt’s record on life, faith, and marriage while governor of Massachusetts.”

But, whatever their influence on the Republican primary, the Christian Right is fighting a losing battle with the rest of the country—above all, when it comes to abortion  and same-sex marriage, the issues they care most about. A strong majority of Americans backs abortion in the early months of a pregnancy. If elected president, it’s exceedingly unlikely that Romney would ever sign legislation that could lead to the indictment of millions of women and tens of thousands of physicians for fetal murder. Last fall, even voters in Mississippi soundly rejected a bill that might have done just that.

Meanwhile, support for gay rights is rising, quite swiftly. Same-sex marriage tops fifty percent in some recent polls, and the remarkably placid response to New York’s recent legalization of the practice will make it easier for other states to follow suit. With over two-thirds of Americans now endorsing the end of Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell, the debate on that once controversial issue is now a matter for historians to analyze.

Continue reading at:   http://www.tnr.com/article/politics/99679/whose-afraid-the-christian-right-the-precipitous-political-decline-conservati

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Shit Christo-Nazi Bryan Fischer Says

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

California and the Rapture-Ready Candidacy of Newt Gingrich

From Truth Dig:   http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/california_and_the_rapture-ready_candidacy_of_newt_gingrich_20120119/

By Deanne Stillman
Posted on Jan 19, 2012

Letter From the West is a monthly series by Deanne Stillman that explores what is going on in our wide open spaces and what we do to one another and all that lives there.

California may be a blue state in terms of voting patterns, but it’s very involved in red state politics, if you consider the role of evangelical voters—as Obama himself did when he asked Pastor Rick Warren of Orange County’s Saddleback Church to give the invocation at his inauguration. To make sure that Newt Gingrich won’t be left behind in the South Carolina primary election, Southern California-based Timothy LaHaye, author of the best-selling “Left Behind” series of books, has just endorsed him. In doing so, LaHaye provides a rapture-ready seal of approval for the former speaker of the House, and may deliver enough votes to upset Mitt Romney, a Mormon whose church has a different approach to saving people, often involving sending young men to France, which was where Mitt once preached “The Book of Mormon”—this, not this. (The latter, by the way, is one of the best American plays in recent memory.)

In the case of the LaHaye endorsement, the idea is that Gingrich is ready to meet his maker … or at least he knows that certain things need to be in place for the Messiah to return and usher in the end times. If you don’t know what those things are, click here for my look at the biblical breakdown, and find out about the hottest affair on the planet—evangelicals and the Holy Land. Are rapture A-listers correct in their literal interpretation of the good book? Well, we may be on a fast track to doomsday as I write this—if you believe along with millions of others that bar codes on consumer goods are a sign of the apocalypse. I happen to count myself among that group, although I’m not sure why we have to decode the New Testament for the news. In any case, now that Gingrich has received LaHaye’s endorsement, I can’t get the following image out of my head: President Gingrich is in the Oval Office, taking that critical 3 a.m. phone call. Our nation has just been attacked! In the middle of the call, he ascends through the roof of the White House as the Messiah makes a landing in Israel. Big surf ravages the land and the fur flies in many nations. Those who are not rapture ready are left behind, at which point the looting begins—and bar codes are instantly meaningless!

Can a nod from LaHaye really make this happen? Perhaps not. To hurry things along, Jerry Falwell has also checked in with an endorsement—from the grave. “As my friend, the late pastor Dr. Jerry Falwell told me personally,” LaHaye said , “ ‘Speaker Newt Gingrich is the most qualified man in America to run as president of the United States.’ ”

Certainly blessings from religious figures for presidential candidates—as well as commanders in chief themselves—are nothing new. We often speak of a separation between church and state in this country, but on some level it doesn’t exist. Is there any living ex-president who hasn’t conferred with Billy Graham moments before launching a war? And what about the role of the black church during the civil rights era? Dr. Martin Luther King’s alliance with the Kennedy brothers—President John and Sen. Bobby—had deep ramifications; without the involvement of the black church in the South, there would have been no civil rights legislation. And then there was Jimmy Carter—a pastor! A man of the Word (cloth? Cloth?) in the very Oval Office, a living embrace of God and the Constitution. He even taught Bible study on Sunday, and his sister, a pastor as well, enjoyed a flurry of fame while Jimmy was president, appearing frequently on television shows to spread the word (Word? News? In any case, hear it we did).

Continue reading at:   http://www.truthdig.com/report/item/california_and_the_rapture-ready_candidacy_of_newt_gingrich_20120119/

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Obama for America 2012 TV AD – The Facts About President Obama’s Energy Record

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

How the Pipeline Died—And How to Bury It For Good

From Yes Magazine: http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/how-the-keystone-pipeline-died-and-how-to-bury-it-for-good

Grassroots strategies paid off for the climate movement in a big way.

by Jamie Henn
posted Jan 18, 2012

This Wednesday afternoon, the Obama administration rejected the permit for Keystone XL, a 1,700 mile oil pipeline that would have run from the tar sands of Alberta to refineries on the Gulf of Mexico. The announcement is a huge victory for the grassroots climate movement. As writer and Keystone XL protest leader Bill McKibben wrote this afternoon,

“This isn’t just the right call, it’s the brave call. The knock on Barack Obama from many quarters has been that he’s too conciliatory. But here, in the face of a naked political threat from Big Oil to exact ‘huge political consequences,’ he’s stood up strong. This is a victory for Americans who testified in record numbers, and who demanded that science get the hearing usually reserved for big money.”

While the fight to stop the Keystone XL pipeline is over for now, the political battle over the consequences of Obama’s decision is just beginning. Big Oil front groups like the American Petroleum Institute and the U.S. Chamber of Commerce are already spending millions of dollars on TV ads to bash the President over Keystone XL. Republicans in Congress have pledged to continue to use legislative tricks to pressure President Obama on the issue. And the mainstream media has vigorously picked up the pipeline as a key election issue in 2012.

As Keystone XL gets pulled into the center of the political battlefield, it’s worth remembering how the pipeline became a national issue and the tactics and strategies that delivered the first significant victory in a fight to stop what Bill has called “a fuse to the largest carbon bomb in North America.” The campaign against Keystone XL was not, after all, a traditional political lobbying effort or online petition drive, but something much more in the spirit of Dr. King’s tactics of “creative nonviolence.”

Continue reading at:   http://www.yesmagazine.org/planet/how-the-keystone-pipeline-died-and-how-to-bury-it-for-good

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Washington: State Senate one vote short of legalizing gay marriage

From The Seattle Times:   http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politicsnorthwest/2017279768_state_senate_one_vote_short_of.html

Posted by Andrew Garber
January 19, 2012

State Sen. Jim Kastama, D-Puyallup, on Thursday announced he’ll support legislation legalizing gay marriage.

“Unlike some of my colleagues in liberal districts, I will not return home to cheers and handshakes,” Kastama said at a news conference. “I represent the district I was raised in. My wife and I purchased and live in the same house I grew up in and we have raised our family there. My district has known me my whole life and for 16 years has entrusted me to be a fiercely independent legislator. The people of my district are generous and decent, but I also know that there are childhood friends who will never forgive me for this vote.”

Kastama’s support means there are 24 state senators — 22 Democrats and two Republicans — who’ve said they’ll vote for Senate Bill 6239. That’s one short of the 25 needed for passage.

The state House already has enough lawmakers in support of the measure to approve it. Gov. Chris Gregoire backs the bill as well.

Complete article at:  http://seattletimes.nwsource.com/html/politicsnorthwest/2017279768_state_senate_one_vote_short_of.html

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Shit Straight Girls Say…. to Lesbians

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Why Is an Atheist High School Student Getting Vicious Death Threats?

From Alternet:   http://www.alternet.org/story/153803/why_is_an_atheist_high_school_student_getting_vicious_death_threats?akid=8146.304909.p3SRPw&rd=1&t=5

Her state representative has called the student “evil” and she has been threatened with violence, rape and death. What gives?

By Greta Christina
January 18, 2012

If you take away just two things from the story about atheist high school student Jessica Ahlquist, and the court case she won last week to have a prayer banner taken out of her public school, let it be these:

  1. The ruling in this case was entirely unsurprising. It is 100 percent in line with unambiguous legal precedent, established and re-established over many decades, exemplifying a basic principle of constitutional law.
  2. As a result of this lawsuit, Jessica Ahlquist is now being bullied, ostracized and threatened with violence in her community. She has been called “evil” in public by her state representative, and is being targeted with multiple threats of violence, rape and death.

Which leads one to wonder: What the hell is going on here?

Let’s get #1 out of the way first. This court decision — that as a public school in the United States, Cranston High School West cannot promote religion, either any particular religion or the idea of religion in general — is, in any legal sense, entirely non-controversial. In ruling after ruling, for decades now, this principle has been made eminently clear. There have, of course, been some genuinely controversial court cases recently about separation of church and state, which examined previously untested questions and established new legal precedent.

But Jessica Ahlquist’s was not one of them. Not even in the slightest. This was a no-brainer. If the school district’s lawyers didn’t uncategorically advise the district that they didn’t stand a snowball’s chance in hell, and fervently plead with them to concede the case before trial, they should be disbarred. (A PDF of the full court ruling, including extensive citation of clear precedent, can be found on the Friendly Atheist blog.)

For anyone who doesn’t understand this ruling or agree with it, let me take a moment to explain. First of all: No, the majority does not always rule. In a constitutional democracy, people with minority, dissenting, or unpopular opinions and identities have some basic rights, which the majority cannot take away. If the majority thought that everyone had to dye their hair brown, or that all witches should be burned at the stake, the majority would not rule. Redheads have the right not to dye their hair brown; witches have the right not to be burned at the stake. No matter how much in the minority they are.

Continue reading at:   http://www.alternet.org/story/153803/why_is_an_atheist_high_school_student_getting_vicious_death_threats?akid=8146.304909.p3SRPw&rd=1&t=5

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Mister Rich Elite 1% Mitt Talks Shit to Ordinary Hard Working American

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

CDC study: Many teen moms didn’t think they could get pregnant, didn’t use birth control

Wow!  Looks like Abstinence Teaching creates ignorance and has shown itself to be an utter failure.  Perhaps we should try Sex Education instead.

From The Washington Post:   http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-study-many-teen-moms-didnt-think-they-could-get-pregnant-didnt-use-birth-control/2012/01/19/gIQA9P6zAQ_story.html?hpid=z3

By Associated Press
Thursday, January 19, 2012

ATLANTA — A new government study suggests a lot of teenage girls are clueless about their chances of getting pregnant.Why they thought that isn’t clear. The Centers for Disease Control and Prevention survey didn’t ask teens to explain.But other researchers have talked to teen moms who believed they couldn’t get pregnant the first time they had sex, didn’t think they could get pregnant at that time of the month or thought they were sterile.

“This report underscores how much misperception, ambivalence and magical thinking put teens at risk for unintended pregnancy,” said Bill Albert, a spokesman for the Washington, D.C.-based National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy.

Other studies have asked teens about their contraception use and beliefs about pregnancy. But the CDC report released Thursday is the first to focus on teens who didn’t want to get pregnant but did.

Continue reading at:  http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/cdc-study-many-teen-moms-didnt-think-they-could-get-pregnant-didnt-use-birth-control/2012/01/19/gIQA9P6zAQ_story.html?hpid=z3

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Class war comes to America?

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

Beware the ‘Gush-Up Gospel’ Behind India’s Billionaires

From ZNet:  http://www.zcommunications.org/beware-the-gush-up-gospel-behind-india-s-billionaires-by-arundhati-roy

By Arundhati Roy
Wednesday, January 18, 2012

Is it a house or a home? A temple to the new India, or a warehouse for its ghosts? Ever since Antilla arrived on Altamount Road in Mumbai, exuding mystery and quiet menace, things have not been the same. “Here we are,” the friend who took me there said, “pay your respects to our new ruler.”

Antilla belongs to India’s richest man, Mukesh Ambani. I’d read about this, the most expensive dwelling ever built, the 27 floors, three helipads, nine lifts, hanging gardens, ballrooms, weather rooms, gymnasiums, six floors of parking, and the 600 servants. Nothing had prepared me for the vertical lawn – a soaring wall of grass attached to a vast metal grid. The grass was dry in patches, bits had fallen off in neat rectangles. Clearly, “trickle down” had not worked.

But “gush-up” has. That’s why in a nation of 1.2bn, India’s 100 richest people own assets equivalent to a quarter of gross domestic product.

The word on the street (and in The New York Times) is, or at least was, that the Ambanis were not living in Antilla. Perhaps they are there now, but people still whisper about ghosts and bad luck, vastu and feng shui. I think it’s all Marx’s fault. Capitalism, he said, “ … has conjured up such gigantic means of production and of exchange, it is like the sorcerer who is no longer able to control the powers of the nether world whom he has called up by his spells”.

In India, the 300m of us who belong to the new, post-“reforms” middle class – the market – live side by side with the ghosts of 250,000 debt-ridden farmers who have killed themselves, and of the 800m who have been impoverished and dispossessed to make way for us. And who survive on less than 50 cents a day.

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off

The United States of Islamophobia

I’m an Atheist and do not believe in any religion. I am also anti-fascist, anti-racist and anti-bullying. Therefore I defend people who are being attacked because of their race and/or religion out of empathy for the bullied.

I am utterly disgusted by the right wing Nazis calling themselves Christian and their racist attacks on Muslim people.

Therefore I defend the right of Muslim people to the same First Amendment protections I expect for myself.

Moreover these attacks are rarely simply religion based attacks but are generally speaking racist attacks aimed at Middle Eastern people.

It is especially despicable for the Government to engage in these attacks on a minority groups human rights and freedoms based race and/or religion.

This is unacceptable and I call on all my human rights supporting readers to take an active stand against these utterly despicable attacks on a group of people chosen for vilification based on their race and religion.

From Socialist Worker:   http://socialistworker.org/2012/01/19/united-states-of-islamophobia

The United States of Islamophobia

Interview: Abdul Malik Mujahid  with Eric Ruder
January 19, 2012

President Barack Obama’s signing of the National Defense Authorization Act (NDAA) on December 31 shocked many people who hoped that Obama, a former constitutional law professor, would reverse the abuses routinely committed by the administration of George W. Bush and Dick Cheney.

But while the NDAA–with its provisions that authorize the military, on the say-so of the president, to indefinitely detain U.S. citizens–is ominous, it certainly isn’t Obama’s first assault on civil liberties. After spending his presidential campaign in 2008 criticizing the Bush administration for providing a “legal” justification for torture, Obama has refused to take action against Bush-era officials for violating international law, and he has made sure the U.S. government’s repressive apparatus remains in place, at home and in countries around the world.

Abdul Malik Mujahid is a leader of Muslim Peace Coalition, an organization formed in 2011 to challenge Islamophobia. He spoke with Eric Ruder about the anxiety that the NDAA has caused in the Muslim American community–and what people are doing to stand up for their rights.

WHAT WAS your reaction was when you heard that Barack Obama had signed the NDAA?

I REMEMBERED a moment when Obama was asked a question while he was still on the campaign trail and competing with Hillary Clinton. “If Dr. King were alive today, would he support you or Hillary Clinton?” someone asked. Obama took a professorial pause and then responded, “He would support neither one of us; he would be mobilizing people for his demands.”

I think all those people who took his promises at face value should have considered that he is a savvy politician. And like all savvy politicians, he must be held to his promises, rather than trusted to deliver.

He has continued and in some ways strengthened the policies of abuse characteristic of the Bush era. Without a doubt, the signing of legislation that authorizes the indefinite detention of American citizens adds to this.

I’m not an economic refugee in America. I had better job, a better life, in my home country. I came here because of the Bill of Rights, because of the promise of freedom above and beyond the practice in my country. But today, it seems like there is more freedom written into the law in Pakistan than there is in the United States.

Complete article at:   http://socialistworker.org/2012/01/19/united-states-of-islamophobia

From Think Progress:    http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/01/18/406061/connecticut-muslim-student-reports-sexual-harassment-gets-reported-to-fbi-for-terrorism-and-expelled-from-university/

Muslim College Student Reports Sexual Harassment, Gets Reported To FBI For Terrorism And Expelled

By Tanya Somanader
Jan 18, 2012

n 2008, African-American Muslim student Balayla Ahmad enrolled in Connecticut’s University of Bridgeport with hopes of becoming a chiropractor. Instead, she became of a victim of sexual harassment. Distressed by the repeated sexual advances and “graphic offensive comments” of a male student, Ahmad reported the harassment and “fears for her safety” to multiple teachers, who urged her to say nothing, and finally the university’s president and dean. The dean told Ahmad, “My hands are tied. What do you suggest I do?”

Rather than having her claims addressed, Ahmad received allegations of her own. Learning of her report, Ahmad’s harasser decided to falsely accuse her of terrorism to the FBI. And rather than fully investigate what was happening, the University of Bridgeport just expelled Ahmad altogether:

After reporting the sexual harassment in April 2009, Ahmad said she was approached by two university security directors who told her someone had made allegations against her and they threatened to call the FBI and have her arrested.

Later, two FBI agents knocked on Ahmad’s apartment door, questioned her and left a business card, according to the lawsuit. She said she learned that her harasser or his associates had fabricated a story falsely accusing her of being a terrorist in apparent retaliation for having made a sexual harassment complaint against him.

“Ahmad was racially profiled and discriminated against because of her race, color and ethnic identity as an African American Muslim and labeled a terrorist based on false accusations provided by the harasser and adopted without adequate investigation by the university,” the lawsuit states.

Continue reading at:  http://thinkprogress.org/security/2012/01/18/406061/connecticut-muslim-student-reports-sexual-harassment-gets-reported-to-fbi-for-terrorism-and-expelled-from-university/

Posted in Uncategorized. Comments Off
Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 78 other followers