Women Born Transsexual

From Right Wing Watch:  http://www.rightwingwatch.org/content/god-tells-robertson-radical-obama-will-bring-down-america

God Tells Robertson that ‘Radical’ Obama will Bring Down America

Submitted by Brian Tashman
on January 3, 2012

Last year, Robertson claimed God told him that America’s future will be bleak because of debt and divisions, and today on The 700 Club said that God again communicated to him that financial problems and partisan politics are going to bring America into decline. Unsurprisingly, Robertson said God is no fan of President Obama: “Your president holds a radical view of the direction of your country which is at odds with the majority, expect chaos and paralysis.” Robertson claimed that the country would be devastated by an “economic collapse” and “the country will begin disintegrating.” He also claimed that God revealed to him who the next president will be, but that he is “not supposed to talk about that.”

Pat Robertson: God revealed the next president, but it’s a secret

From Raw Story: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/03/pat-robertson-god-revealed-the-next-president-but-its-a-secret/

By David Edwards
Tuesday, January 3, 2012

Pat Robertson says God has told him who the next president will be — but it’s a secret.

The televangelist revealed on Tuesday that he had spent the nearly a week in prayer, asking God to “show me something.”

“I think He showed me the next president, but I’m not supposed to talk about that,” Robertson explained. “So I’ll leave you in the dark — probably just as well — I think I’ll know who it will be.”

“Your president holds a radical view of the direction of your country which is at odds with the majority, expect chaos and paralysis,” God reportedly said.

Continue reading at:   http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/03/pat-robertson-god-revealed-the-next-president-but-its-a-secret/

From Huffington Post: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/rick-santorum-birth-control-sodomy_n_1181291.html?ref=tw

Laura Bassett
01/ 3/12

Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum, whose strong base of evangelical Christian supporters has thrust him into contention in Iowa, said on Monday that he believes states should have the right to outlaw birth control and sodomy without the interference of the Supreme Court.

In an interview with Jake Tapper on ABC News, Santorum reiterated his opposition to the Supreme Court’s 1965 ruling that prevented Connecticut from banning contraception.

“The state has a right to do that, I have never questioned that the state has a right to do that,” he said. “It is not a constitutional right. The state has the right to pass whatever statutes they have. That’s the thing I have said about the activism of the Supreme Court–they are creating rights, and it should be left up to the people to decide.”

Santorum said he also opposes the Supreme Court’s 2003 Lawrence v. Texas decision striking down a ban on sodomy in Texas and 13 other states. Even though he would not personally vote for a ban on sodomy, he said, he thinks states should legally be able to pass them, because sodomy is not a constitutionally protected right.

“I thought that law was an improper law … but that doesn’t mean the state doesn’t have a right to do that,” he said.

Continue reading at:    http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/01/03/rick-santorum-birth-control-sodomy_n_1181291.html?ref=tw

From Raw Story: http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/03/missouri-public-library-blocks-websites-about-occult-spirituality/

By Eric W. Dolan
Tuesday, January 3, 2012

The Salem Public Library in Missouri along with its board of trustees face a lawsuit for blocking access to websites discussing indigenous American spirituality and the Wiccan faith

The American Civil Liberties Union and the ACLU of Eastern Missouri filed the lawsuit Tuesday on behalf of Salem resident Anaka Hunter, who was unable to access websites pertaining to the religions for her own research.

Hunter brought the blocked websites to the attention of Salem Library Director Glenda Wofford, but Wofford responded there was nothing she could do about the websites, which were blocked by the library’s filtering system. Wofford said she would only allow access to blocked sites if she felt patrons had a legitimate reason to view the content and further said that she had an “obligation” to call the “proper authorities” to report people who wanted to view the sites, according to the lawsuit.

The library is required by law to have a filtering system that prevents children from accessing obscene images and other content that is harmful to minors.

Continue reading at:   http://www.rawstory.com/rs/2012/01/03/missouri-public-library-blocks-websites-about-occult-spirituality/

From World Wide Hippies: http://www.worldwidehippies.com/2011/12/31/stoned-seniors-germany-faces-epidemic-of-hippy-pensioners/

By TONY PATERSON,Independent.co.uk -
2011 December 31

They include sixty-plus grandmothers spaced out on LSD and 70-year-old grandpas in court for dealing dope: Germany is struggling to cope with a rapid increase in “pensioner hippies” who are still hooked on drugs nearly half a century after the end of the Flower Power era.

The “stoned grandparent” phenomenon has begun to alarm legal and welfare authorities in the country’s most populous state of North Rhine Westphalia, where the number of pensioners annually convicted of drug offences has almost doubled over the past decade to around 117 each year.

The problem has prompted the launch of a scheme to help geriatric specialists familiarise themselves with addiction and old age. “Older people are increasingly turning to illegal drugs,” Gaby Schnell of the regional senior citizen’s association told Germany’s Der Spiegel magazine. “This is a new development which has only surfaced over the last few years.”

Most of the cases on record have involved pensioner-aged hippies convicted of drug related offences. In one incident, a narcotics crime squad in Dortmund arrested a 69-year-old drugs dealer nicknamed “Opium grandpa”. Officers tricked the pensioner into selling them 20 grams of the drug in exchange for €250. He was given a two year suspended sentence.

Other cases included a 71-year-old pensioner convicted of selling marijuana to adolescents in a Cologne park and a 73-year old who required medical treatment after consuming too many “hash cookies”. A recent police investigation in Solingen broke up a ring in which an 85-year-old woman was actively engaged in pushing hard drugs. Three kilos of heroin, a quantity of cocaine and two guns were found in her apartment. More…

From The Guardian UK: http://www.guardian.co.uk/environment/2012/jan/04/us-european-dominance-farming

Call for significant increase in UK food production to counter threat of losing influence at global level

From Talking Points Memo:     http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/right-wing_fox_friends_warn_girl_scouts_promote_li.php?ref=fpb

Jillian Rayfield
December 30, 2011

Right-wing bloggers and Fox News have managed to squeeze in one more liberal conspiracy theory before the end of 2011.

The controversy is over a section in the Girl Scouts’ media guide that advises readers to use sites like snopes.com and MediaMatters to fact-check what they read on the Internet. Because, as Steve Doocy put it on Fox & Friends on Thursday, MediaMatters is “clearly a lefty blog,” and the Girl Scouts telling members to turn to them means they must secretly be in the tank for the left.

Glenn Beck’s site The Blaze first wrote about the guide on Tuesday, and said that it was pointed out to them by a parent of Sydney Volankski, a fifteen-year old former Girl Scout who left the organization in 2010 when she says she realized the organization has a “clear liberal ideology.”

In response, she started a blog called “Speak Now: Girl Scouts,” and on Thursday she popped up on Fox News.

Doocy asked Volanski how she “started noticing, kind of, what you would feel is a liberal agenda” in the Girl Scouts.

Continue reading at:   http://tpmmuckraker.talkingpointsmemo.com/2011/12/right-wing_fox_friends_warn_girl_scouts_promote_li.php?ref=fpb

From Addicting Info: http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/01/ron-paul-endorses-sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace-blames-women-and-says-it-should-be-legal-video/

By Stephen D. Foster Jr.
January 1, 2012

Ron Paul has recently been trending upward in the polls and all the skeletons have come bursting out of the closet. From his homophobia to his racist newsletters, Ron Paul has been taking a beating like no other candidate. And now, he has provided yet another reason why no one should vote for him.

On Fox News Sunday with Chris Wallace, Ron Paul said that sexual harassment in the workplace should be legal and that if women didn’t like it, they should get another job somewhere else.

CHRIS WALLACE: “I want to ask you about one other thing that you wrote back in your book in 1987 about sexual harassment in the workplace.

You wrote this, “Why don’t” — this is about the victims of sexual harassment. “Why don’t they quit once the so-called harassment starts? Obviously, the morals of the harasser cannot be defended, but how can the harassee escape some responsibility for the problem?”

You said that sexual harassment should not be a violation of someone’s employment rights?”

Complete article at:   http://www.addictinginfo.org/2012/01/01/ron-paul-endorses-sexual-harassment-in-the-workplace-blames-women-and-says-it-should-be-legal-video/

From RH Reality Check:    http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2011/12/26/should-woman-feel-sad-about-her-abortion-hell-no

by Sunsara Taylor
January 2, 2012

There is absolutely nothing wrong, or necessarilty tragic, unfortunate, or sad about a woman choosing to get an abortion. Nothing.

Why?

Because being forced to have a child against your will is enslavement. Period.

Why else?

Because fetuses are NOT babies. Fetuses have the potential to become babies, but until they are born they have no independent social or biological existence. They are a subordinate part of a woman’s body. Any state, religious, or family intervention which forces – or even pressures – a woman into subordinating her life, dreams and health to incubating that fetus against her will is completely unjust and illegitimate. It is immoral and it is enslaving.

But what about her responsibility? If she didn’t want a baby, shouldn’t she have thought of that before she “opened her legs?”

This argument is wrong on at least four levels.

First, this suggests that it is wrong for women to have sex and that they must be punished for doing so (while applying a totally different standard to men).

Second, this approach treats children – who should be wanted, loved, and well-cared for – like nothing more than a punishment to women.

Continue reading at:   http://www.rhrealitycheck.org/article/2011/12/26/should-woman-feel-sad-about-her-abortion-hell-no